Columns

Food Safety: The well-dressed worker

August 1, 2009
/ Print / Reprints /
ShareMore
/ Text Size+
Proper plant attire is just one more way to help protect the food supply.



Uniforms and other food and beverage plant apparel accessories often differ from plant to plant dependent on the type of product being produced. The current Good Manufacturing Practices found in 21 CFR Part 110 provide this guidance: “Wearing outer garments suitable to the operation in a manner that protects against the contamination of food, food-contact surfaces, or food packaging materials.” The Codex Food Hygiene document contains similar language: “Wear suitable protective clothing, head covering and footwear.”

The key word in both documents is “suitable.” The point is to protect food and processing equipment, specifically food contact surfaces and ingredients. What is suitable in one operation may not be suitable in another.

For example, in aseptic processing and filling, product is exposed during batching and in a fully-enclosed system once it leaves the batching area. Therefore, the potential for contamination in batching is high, whereas it is minimal throughout the rest of the operation. So, should batchers wear one type of clothing and filler operators another?  It is up to each plant.

Many processors find it easier to mandate that all processing workers wear hair restraints and uniforms. This is easier and less expensive than establishing rules for each plant area. In addition, these garments should be worn in the food processing facility only and not worn in restrooms, lunch rooms or off-site. To ensure proper usage, processing facilities should provide hooks or hangers so workers can hang their work clothes before leaving the plant floor.

Ready-to-eat product processors often divide plants into raw and cooked/prepared sections and often mandate workers in each area wear different colored uniforms. When passing between the two areas, visitors will be asked to change garments and usually their boots.

To minimize the potential for cross contamination, here are a few basic guidelines:

  • Be sure clothing is manufactured from materials not prone to shedding or coming apart. Synthetic fabrics are better than wool or cotton. Synthetics may be warmer, but they do no breathe as well as natural fibers.

  • Buttons are verboten. Instead use metal snaps, zippers with solid pulls, velcro or hooks.

  • Garments should have no pockets on the outside. If pockets are necessary, they should be located below the waist on long smocks or coats. Some facilities now allow internal breast pockets on uniforms.

  • All garments must be clean and in good condition. If they become soiled, workers should change. If garments are damaged, they must be fixed or taken out of service.

    Hair restraints are another essential. Properly worn hair nets (meaning all hair contained within the net) help ensure hair does not get into food. White hair nets are very visible, whereas black nets are harder to spot. Many operations also require that ears be completely covered. Workers with beards or moustaches should wear beard nets or snoods, and those with excessive arm hair should be directed to wear long sleeve shirts with elastic wrist straps.

    All clothes must be clean and in good repair. The laundry service, whether it is outsourced or maintained internally, must inspect uniforms for damage and remove them from service if necessary. Uniforms should be washed and dried under conditions that ensure microbiological cleanliness. A hot water wash that includes records of washing conditions and calibrated thermometers is desired. Processors should audit laundry facilities to ensure that clothes are not only being cleaned, but there is no source of cross-contamination.

    Plants should develop a clothing policy and ensure the plan is maintained. Managers who fail to follow the policy set a bad example for workers and can undermine the policy.
  • Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Food Engineering Magazine.

    Recent Articles by Richard Stier, Contributing Editor

    You must login or register in order to post a comment.

    Multimedia

    Videos

    Image Galleries

    Plant of the Year 2014

    Blue Diamond Growers was chosen as Food Engineering's 2014 Plant of the Year. The Sacramento-based company is the world’s largest producer of almonds and almond ingredients.

    Podcasts

    Burns & McDonnell project manager RJ Hope and senior project engineer Justin Hamilton discuss the distinctions between Food Safety and Food Defense as well as the implications for food manufacturers of the Food Safety Modernization Act.
    More Podcasts

    Food Engineering

    FE November 2014 Cover

    2014 November

    In the November 2014 issue of Food Engineering read about the Sustainable Plant of the Year, Smithfield Foods. Also, discover good reasons to consider a plant renovation project.

    Table Of Contents Subscribe

    FSMA Audit

    What is the is most important step you have taken to become ready for a FSMA audit?
    View Results Poll Archive

    THE FOOD ENGINEERING STORE

    Food-Authentication-Flyer-(.gif
    Food Authentication Using Bioorganic Molecules

    This text provides critical tools and data needed to augment routine food analysis and enhance food safety by aiding in the detection of counterfeit, and potentially deleterious, foods.

    More Products

    Clear Seas Research

    Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

    STAY CONNECTED

    FE recent tweets

    facebook_40.pngtwitter_40px.pngyoutube_40px.png linkedin_40px.pngGoogle +

    Food Master

    Food Master Cover 2014Food Master 2014 is now available!

    Where the buying process begins in the food and beverage manufacturing market. 

    Visit www.foodmaster.com to learn more.