Manufacturing News
Food Allergies

Dutch firm pushes for global harmonization on allergy labeling

Food research facility wants consensus among key stakeholders on allergen thresholds and labeling standards

Dutch firm pushes for global harmonization on allergy labeling

An enormous number of people around the world are affected by allergens in food. Reactions can range from unpleasant to debilitating to fatal. As a result, food manufacturers are extremely sensitive to the effects of allergens in the products they produce. 

However, few standards exist internationally on how allergens are labeled. That’s something that TNO, a food research facility in Zeist, part of Holland’s “silicon valley” of food science near Amsterdam, has been working to change.

The main culprits include, but are not limited to, nuts, shellfish, wheat, milk, eggs, soy, sesame seeds, mustard seeds and gluten.

In some cases, serious allergens exist in foods and warnings are not placed on products. In other cases, allergens are listed that really don’t need to be, because they exist in such trace amounts that pose minimal risk. Unnecessary labeling creates unfounded concerns and loss of sales. 

“Allergens are connected to various proteins in food,” says Geert Houben, business line manager food safety at TNO.  “Doses that can cause reactions differ from allergen to allergen, and range between 0.03 mg of protein to 10 mg of protein or more, meaning a difference of more than 300 times.”

In regard to labeling, Houben says TNO’s approach is to try to get consensus among stakeholders and help producers to self regulate based on in-depth research.  “Getting a legal position from governments is a process that takes quite some time.  The best route is getting stakeholders to self regulate,” he notes. “What this means is getting industries to research exactly how serious the risks are, set thresholds allergen by allergen, and agree to common labeling standards based on research findings and acceptable risk levels among all affected stakeholders, especially those who are vulnerable.”

This means stating categorically if a food product is either known either to “contain” a recognized allergen, or if it “may contain” such allergen, where contact or contamination risk may be incidental and not clear or measurable. 

He points out that governments, once they see a serious commitment among industry to self regulate on such an important area as allergen labeling, they may be willing to approve industry initiatives. 

“In Reading, UK, we organized an international meeting involving governments, physicians, consumer groups, dieticians, food scientists and others in late 2012.  We got a very strong consensus that self regulation is the right way to proceed.”

Health Canada was a co-organizer of the meeting and, according to Houben, is among many governments that are keen on participating. “A big challenge we need to face is communication—how do stakeholders communicate on this very complex issue with one another and, more bottom line, how should physicians communicate with their allergy patients?” he asks. “As for government regulation, inspectors have a role to keep a check on things, but the main work is best left up to industry.”

In regard to research so far, Houben noted that insights into the problem of allergens are still relatively poor.  Most research is retrospective--where investigators ask sufferers if they had an allergic reaction during the last 12 months and from what product. He said they always get a lot of response on that kind of question, but often nothing definitive.  People with food allergies are used to living with their problems and often don’t remember or admit to exactly what caused a reaction.

“What we’ve started in the Netherlands,” says Houben, “is prospective research.  It’s the first allergen research of its kind, as far as I’m aware, in the world.  We started a few months ago and are getting allergy sufferers to report any reactions immediately, and to send in food samples from what caused them so we can follow up with analysis.  This is helping us to develop thresholds and corresponding labeling protocols.”

Houben says there needs to be a better correlation between allergy warnings on food products and the level of risk that industry, governments, society and most of all, those potentially affected, are willing to accept.  “To date, this doesn’t exist.  How do you go about doing that?  First is to get a consensus on this way of thinking.  We have many stakeholders from most continents of the world in agreement that this is the way we should move forward.  Accepted risk and food production is a matter of careful balance.  I think we are well on our way to achieving that internationally.”


For more information, contact TNO at

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Food Engineering Magazine.

Recent Articles by Jaan Koel, Contributing Editor

You must login or register in order to post a comment.



Image Galleries

Food Engineering's Food Automation & Manufacturing Conference and Expo 2015

Images from Food Engineering's Food Automation & Manufacturing Conference and Expo in Clearwater Beach, Florida, April 12-15, 2015. The event brought food and beverage processors and suppliers together to gain valuable information on the latest trends and technologies in manufacturing, automation, sustainability and food safety.


Burns & McDonnell project manager RJ Hope and senior project engineer Justin Hamilton discuss the distinctions between Food Safety and Food Defense as well as the implications for food manufacturers of the Food Safety Modernization Act.
More Podcasts

Food Engineering

Food Engineering May 2015 Cover

2015 May

The May 2015 issue of Food Engineering explores effective tools for hitting manufacturing targets. Also, read how processors are looking for faster ways to detect harmful pathogens in food and beverages without sacrificing accuracy or reliability.

Table Of Contents Subscribe

Plant Facility/Site Issues

What issue about your current plant facility/site keeps you up the most at night?
View Results Poll Archive


Food Authentication Using Bioorganic Molecules

This text provides critical tools and data needed to augment routine food analysis and enhance food safety by aiding in the detection of counterfeit, and potentially deleterious, foods.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.


FE recent tweets

facebook_40.pngtwitter_40px.pngyoutube_40px.png linkedin_40px.pngGoogle +

Food Master

Food Engineering Food Master 2015Food Master 2015 is now available!

Where the buying process begins in the food and beverage manufacturing market. 

Visit to learn more.