Selecting the best temperature measurement and control systems for your plant

PID, data acquisition and programmable logic controller systems all have benefits and drawbacks.

Selecting the best temperature measurement and control systems for your plant
Source: ISA

Temperature measurement and control are absolutely essential to the quality of manufactured goods, as well as the efficient and safe operation of a system. But choosing the best option from the available options can be difficult.

Options range from simple temperature controllers to more complex distributed control systems. Low-cost monitoring and control devices tend to work best in applications where they are not exposed to environmental stresses; they do not respond well to excessive electrical noise, exposure to over-voltage situations and other stressors. For environments with these types of stresses, a more complex distributed system may be necessary.

Stable, reliable performance is a main objective when selecting temperature measurement and control systems. They should also provide data in the application’s required form, whether for compliance reporting or mandatory plant data archiving. The systems should also be cost effective, with long life spans. 

The ability to measure the required temperature sensor via thermocouples, resistance temperature detectors and DC voltage or mA outputs is the first step in selection.  Thermocouple sensors are economical, durable devices that provide accurate measurements for a range of temperatures. Resistance temperature detectors (RTDs) are even more accurate, but are more expensive and offer a smaller range of temperatures. Both types of devices are suitable for excessive temperature and vibration.

Temperature transmitters measure and transmit data from thermocouple sensors or RTDs close to the field. They’re typically hardened for outdoor use and can output temperature data in a variety of formats, from 4- to 20-mA to various digital data protocols such as HART. Smart sensors can also transmit diagnostic and calibration data.

Methods for handling this data include direct input into an existing control system, be it a distributed control system, PID controller, programmable logic controller or data acquisition system. Because a large process can require hundreds of sensor measurements, and operators will need to view the data, effective archiving is essential.

The best solution for handling data is dependent on many factors including overall cost, existing control system capacity and suitability for achieving project goals. Single-loop PID controllers are effective for monitoring and controlling a limited number of temperature loops while providing local operator interface, superior control performance and the ability to output process values to information systems via analog retransmission or digital data format.

Data acquisition systems (DASs) and programmable logic controllers (PLCs), alternatively, are the best option for measuring and controlling a large number of temperature points. DAS lends itself to applications requiring low-cost data display, storage and access to users. They can also be used to expand the capacity of an existing control system, such as a distributed control system (DCS), by measuring and retransmitting multiple temperature sensor inputs.

PLCs are the best choice for extensive control needs, but represent a significant cost increase over DAS. PLCs offer similar temperature measurement performance to most DASs, but may not support certain types of thermocouple sensors or RTDs. PLCs are also prone to the inferior measurement of electrically noisy inputs and usually don’t have local data recording capability.

In applications where PLC limitations are a hindrance, often a DAS system can be incorporated to measure unusual input sensors, provide more accurate data and allow data to be backed up for quick access. Plants with established PLC expertise and support often benefit from the system’s cost effectiveness, but DAS’s measurement performance, easy-to-use software and easy connectivity to other plant systems make it an attractive solution as well.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Food Engineering Magazine.

You must login or register in order to post a comment.



Image Galleries

Plant of the Year 2015

Mars Chocolate was chosen as Food Engineering’s 2015 Plant of the Year. The first new Mars candy plant in North America in 35 years is not only LEED Gold certified, it’s highly automated as well.


Burns & McDonnell project manager RJ Hope and senior project engineer Justin Hamilton discuss the distinctions between Food Safety and Food Defense as well as the implications for food manufacturers of the Food Safety Modernization Act.
More Podcasts

Food Engineering

Food Engineering April 2015 Cover

2015 April

The April 2014 issue of Food Engineering features the Plant of the Year: Mars Chocolate. The first new Mars chocolate candy plant in North America in 35 years is not only LEED Gold certified, it’s highly automated as well.

Table Of Contents Subscribe

Plant Facility/Site Issues

What issue about your current plant facility/site keeps you up the most at night?
View Results Poll Archive


Food Authentication Using Bioorganic Molecules

This text provides critical tools and data needed to augment routine food analysis and enhance food safety by aiding in the detection of counterfeit, and potentially deleterious, foods.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.


FE recent tweets

facebook_40.pngtwitter_40px.pngyoutube_40px.png linkedin_40px.pngGoogle +

Food Master

Food Engineering Food Master 2015Food Master 2015 is now available!

Where the buying process begins in the food and beverage manufacturing market. 

Visit to learn more.