Manufacturing News

Separating winners from losers in consumer packaged goods

A new report says different-sized companies are using different methods to create growth.

Separating winners from losers in consumer packaged goods

A new report comparing the performance of small ($100 million to $1 billion in retail sales), medium ($1 billion to $5 billion) and large (more than $5 billion) consumer packaged goods companies found that although all categories are growing, they are creating growth through different methods.

While winning small and midsize companies are growing dollar and volume sales plus gaining market share in their respective categories, few large companies are driving dollar, volume and market growth. Instead, large companies are growing mostly through distribution gains on businesses and unsustainable price gains.

The report, from the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) and IRI, says small and midsize companies are increasingly taking market share from their largest competitors, and growth drivers underscore a significant shift in category dollars. Each top-10 small or medium company grew in 2012, and eight of 10 grew by at least one share point. In contrast, large companies have lost 1.4 share points as a group since 2009, representing around $10 billion in lost sales.

To accurately evaluate the changes that have affected CPG companies, researchers evaluated three “levers.” First, dollar sales percent change was analyzed with respect to base vs. innovation contribution to the total change and contribution to the change from base sales through velocity and distribution.

Second, researchers studied volume sales percent change in relation to dollar sales percent change and changes in household penetration and buy rates. Companies growing dollar sales faster than volume sales likely increased prices, leading to unsustainable growth. Price increases were analyzed by true shift vs. mix shift.

Lever three was dollar share point change. Researchers examined the percent of portfolio gaining, holding and losing share as well as category dynamics such as portfolio concentration and trends.

In examining these three levers, researchers found large companies are pulling different ones—few are growing in dollar sales, volume sales and market share. The winners among large companies are mostly relying on pricing for growth, with only four of the top 10 companies growing shares. The remaining six companies either held steady or lost share.

Alternatively, winning midsize companies performed well across all metrics including market share. The top two midsize winners—Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and Chobani—demonstrated significant gains across all three metrics, and each of the top 10 medium companies gained share points. Most midsize winners also increased dollar and volume sales proportionally.

In the small company category, winners are driving growth by gaining market share while adding dollar and volume sales. Eight of the top 10 winners among small companies saw a jump in share of 1 percent or higher.

Overall, researchers observed a trend of midsize and smaller companies outperforming larger ones and gaining market share in the process. Around $10 billion in industry sales have shifted from large companies to midsize and small players since 2009, according to BCG and IRI’s data. That translates to a net loss of 1.4 share points for large companies at the same time small and medium companies realized a .6 and .3 hike, respectively.

Based on its data, BCG and IRI recommended large companies rely less on pricing schemes and instead balance base and innovation growth. Midsize and small companies should strive to maintain the balanced growth created by base business, volume and share increases.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Food Engineering Magazine.

You must login or register in order to post a comment.



Image Galleries

Food Engineering's Food Automation & Manufacturing Conference and Expo 2015

Images from Food Engineering's Food Automation & Manufacturing Conference and Expo in Clearwater Beach, Florida, April 12-15, 2015. The event brought food and beverage processors and suppliers together to gain valuable information on the latest trends and technologies in manufacturing, automation, sustainability and food safety.


Burns & McDonnell project manager RJ Hope and senior project engineer Justin Hamilton discuss the distinctions between Food Safety and Food Defense as well as the implications for food manufacturers of the Food Safety Modernization Act.
More Podcasts

Food Engineering

Food Engineering May 2015 Cover

2015 May

The May 2015 issue of Food Engineering explores effective tools for hitting manufacturing targets. Also, read how processors are looking for faster ways to detect harmful pathogens in food and beverages without sacrificing accuracy or reliability.

Table Of Contents Subscribe

Plant Facility/Site Issues

What issue about your current plant facility/site keeps you up the most at night?
View Results Poll Archive


Food Authentication Using Bioorganic Molecules

This text provides critical tools and data needed to augment routine food analysis and enhance food safety by aiding in the detection of counterfeit, and potentially deleterious, foods.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.


FE recent tweets

facebook_40.pngtwitter_40px.pngyoutube_40px.png linkedin_40px.pngGoogle +

Food Master

Food Engineering Food Master 2015Food Master 2015 is now available!

Where the buying process begins in the food and beverage manufacturing market. 

Visit to learn more.