Manufacturing News / Processing
11th Annual Replacement Parts Survey

Replacement Parts Survey: Advancing inventory practices

While cutting costs drives innovation in product sourcing and inventory management, processors are demanding higher-quality spare parts.

July 3, 2013

The survey identifies plant maintenance management strategies and parts and component inventory practices, as well as how inventory is managed. The study of food and beverage personnel involved in spare parts ordering noted facilities turn to general administration/executive management personnel in greater numbers to oversee the majority of maintenance replacement decisions and strategies.

Employees with administrative or executive titles make the call on replacement decisions 13 percent of the time, a figure more than triple the number in last year’s report (4 percent).  Plant operations employees do more decision-making now (19 percent) than a year ago (12 percent).

Maintenance personnel still make the majority of the maintenance replacement decisions overall (45 percent), but they saw their role reduced significantly from the prior year (64 percent).

The average dollar volume spent on replacement parts and components totaled $1.24 million, down from $1.34 million reported in 2012.

Nearly two-thirds of survey participants spent up to $1 million on replacement parts and components. Nearly one-third of participants say their annual replacement parts purchases amounted to between $100,000 to $499,999, up from the prior year, when one-fourth spent this amount on replacement parts. One-quarter of respondents purchased between $1 million and $4 million in replacement parts and components, down from last year when one-third of companies made purchases at this level.


Inventory interests

More than 40 percent of food and beverage companies have changed their inventory practices. Thirty percent of participants are reducing their replacement parts inventory and say cost is the main reason, followed by an effort to move to a just-in-time model or to dispose of obsolete parts.

Twelve percent of respondents are increasing their inventory of replacement parts and components, with new equipment needs emerging as the primary reason. New equipment also helps manufacturers eliminate or decrease downtime.

High-quality OEM replacement parts and components are selected 32 percent of the time when most parts are commodities with price as the determining factor when specifying requirements.

Nearly half of respondents say  they have quantified the maintenance cost of most machinery parts and are able to calculate ROI on higher-quality, expensive parts. One-third of those surveyed say they buy OEM when most parts are commodities and where price is the determining factor. Almost one in eight says manpower shortages force plants to specify the highest-quality available part as a way to prolong mean time to failure.

Problems from non-OEM parts vary from not working as well compared to an OEM part to concerns that received parts may be counterfeit. One-fifth of participants say they avoid potential work stoppages and downtime by using only OEM parts. Nearly 40 percent of respondents say less expensive non-OEM parts work just as well as their higher-priced counterparts.

An equal number (40 percent) says less expensive parts do not work as well as more expensive alternatives, and one-third report they have experienced premature machine failures with less expensive parts. “Careful evaluations are done before we use non-OEM parts,” says one reader.

Ninety percent of respondents consider the lifecycle cost of replacement parts as significant when making new equipment purchasing decisions. Three in 10 companies say they always consider lifecycle costs of the replacement part or component in their purchasing decision, while six in 10 say sometimes they consider it.

Replacement part ordering is automated in 75 percent of plants. Half of the companies report automating their ordering with system-generated purchase orders. Ten percent of respondents say they automate ordering with a direct link to a parts supplier or distributor, while another 11 percent rely on standardized hard copy purchase orders.

Regularly scheduled visual inspections are cited as the main maintenance replacement strategy implemented, selected more than half the time; the run-to-failure strategy is favored 20 percent of the time. Additional strategies include a time-based or volume-based parts replacement schedule, automated measuring of parts and components, and predictive tools such as vibration analysis, thermal imaging and energy use or heat measurement. 

A reader states one time-based approach could be “based off hour meters, stroke counters, etc. to track lifespan [of the component] and then schedule preventative change outs at 90-95 percent lifespan.” Another reader says he uses “more condition-monitoring equipment to time replacing parts on a time or volume basis.”

When asked what condition-monitoring tools  the maintenance program uses, thermal imaging and vibration analyzers emerge as the top two selections, with more than half of the maintenance programs using them.

Infrared sensors, oil analyzers and ultrasonic sensors are chosen by four out of 10 plants;  one out of 10 chooses stethoscopes as a condition-monitoring tool. Two of every 10 respondents indicate no condition monitoring is done at their company.


What’s your MRO?

Three maintenance repair operations (MRO) inventory practices are equally leveraged among companies this year: remanufacturing or re-engineering of parts onsite in a machine shop; vendor-managed inventory; and parts kits for routine maintenance. Central warehousing of common parts for use at multiple plant locations and consignment where the supplier owns the components are other, more common MRO practices.

A growing number of food and beverage facilities rely on less common types of MRO inventory practices (14 percent for 2013 as opposed to 4 percent reported a year ago). Survey contributors say other MRO cost-cutting strategies include “working with our suppliers and moving to a reliability-based maintenance system;” “review what parts are critical to maintain the operation of the equipment;” and “review which components have the longest lead time; if the replacement parts are high dollar items, they can be purchased in monthly increments instead of all at one time.” One firm says it created a new salaried position for parts maintenance and inventory control.

Less than half (43 percent) have implemented MRO cost-cutting strategies.  However, inventory reduction and vendor-managed inventories are mentioned frequently among food and beverage companies that have implemented a cost-cutting strategy. Reduction of obsolete parts is an additional strategy.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Food Engineering Magazine.

Recent Articles by Mikell Knights

You must login or register in order to post a comment.



Image Galleries

Food Engineering's Food Automation & Manufacturing Conference and Expo 2015

Images from Food Engineering's Food Automation & Manufacturing Conference and Expo in Clearwater Beach, Florida, April 12-15, 2015. The event brought food and beverage processors and suppliers together to gain valuable information on the latest trends and technologies in manufacturing, automation, sustainability and food safety.


Burns & McDonnell project manager RJ Hope and senior project engineer Justin Hamilton discuss the distinctions between Food Safety and Food Defense as well as the implications for food manufacturers of the Food Safety Modernization Act.
More Podcasts

Food Engineering

Food Engineering May 2015 Cover

2015 May

The May 2015 issue of Food Engineering explores effective tools for hitting manufacturing targets. Also, read how processors are looking for faster ways to detect harmful pathogens in food and beverages without sacrificing accuracy or reliability.

Table Of Contents Subscribe

Plant Facility/Site Issues

What issue about your current plant facility/site keeps you up the most at night?
View Results Poll Archive


Food Authentication Using Bioorganic Molecules

This text provides critical tools and data needed to augment routine food analysis and enhance food safety by aiding in the detection of counterfeit, and potentially deleterious, foods.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.


FE recent tweets

facebook_40.pngtwitter_40px.pngyoutube_40px.png linkedin_40px.pngGoogle +

Food Master

Food Engineering Food Master 2015Food Master 2015 is now available!

Where the buying process begins in the food and beverage manufacturing market. 

Visit to learn more.