While food and beverage applications represent a small part of industrial robotics, suppliers acknowledge they constitute one of the fastest growing segments.
One of the earliest food uses occurred in 1985, when a Canadian plant of confectioner Rowntree Macintosh deployed a unit to transfer candies from molding to a wrapping line. High costs and reliability issues slowed the adoption of robotics to additional factory tasks, and many obstacles-product variability, gentle handling, equipment cleanability and sanitation-had to be addressed before technology developed for discreet manufacturing could be transferred to food.
To be sure, the vast majority of robots are found in the packaging area, with secondary functions such as case packing and palletizing dominating. Material handling robots are beginning to generate ho-hum reactions, though an articulated arm robot still draws crowds at tradeshows. Prodded by auto manufacturers who want the flexibility to pick-and-place engine blocks and other heavy objects, today's articulated arm robots can handle 600 pounds or more in a graceful, sweeping motion. Even with club packs, few food products approach those payload demands, but the machines' flexibility and cost-effectiveness in even moderate-volume palletizing tasks give them great appeal.
Articulated arm robots also are adept at multi-tasking. Brewerton, NY-based Schneider Packaging Equipment Co. recently installed a unit that handles both case packing and palletizing tasks. An XRX controller manages the motion of the system's five-axis Motoman robot with an articulated arm that handles 176 pounds, half of which is the weight of the end-of-arm tooling. That leaves enough capacity to power an 88-pound case from the packing area to a pallet position up to 81 inches away. Four, eight-unit cases a minute can be cycled. An Allen-Bradley PLC oversees the system, coordinating all events and providing the operator interface for changeovers and maintenance.
A mechanical system would cost more and require at least 50 percent more floor space, estimates Schneider's Izzat Hammad, but a more important distinction is the system's ability to handle multiple products and shapes. "Because of the flexibility in changeovers and the elimination of long accumulating conveyors behind the robot, we see tremendous potential in food and beverage," says Hammad.
Articulated arm units are cannibalizing the market for gantry-style robots, an earlier version of palletizing robots that still enjoy popularity in distribution centers where mixed pallet loads must be assembled to meet the demands of each customer. "Robots are certainly taking the place of gantries," laments Earl Wohlrab, manager of Alvey Systems Inc.'s palletizing division. "Whether it's true or not, they're seen as taking less space than gantries." His firm integrates both types of palletizers, and he believes gantries "will definitely continue to shrink as a weapon in the arsenal."
"Packaging is probably the fastest growing market for robotics," seconds Mike Crane of the packaging robotics division of ABB Inc., in Auburn Hills, MI. "We expected a 30 percent increase per year, but we're well ahead of that in 2004 and will probably see 80 percent growth."
Kraft, Nestle, Hershey and other major food companies were early adopters of robotics, but arguably the industry's most aggressive user of the technology is Pepperidge Farm. The bakery's Downingtown, PA, facility installed selective compliance assembly robot arm (SCARA) robots in 1987, and the Denver, PA, plant is a symphony of Delta-style robots on the cookie packaging lines. Today, approximately 95 robots deliver high-speed, flexible automation functions companywide, according to Dave Watson, Pepperidge's vice president of engineering.
"The robots themselves have always been a non-issue in production integration," says Watson. "The challenges always have been issues like the discharge of the product, how it is presented to the robot and other external factors." Vastly improved vision systems, quantum increases in handling speeds and significant shrinkage of robots' footprints are among the most significant improvements in the technology in the last 17 years, he says.
Pepperidge continues to push the robotics envelope, most recently at its Bloomfield, CT, facility, Food Engineering's 2004 Plant of the Year. A system employing a FANUC robot to palletize breadbaskets was recently installed at the plant, but it pales in comparison to an automatic pan-handling system that employs five ABB robots and constitutes "the heart of the productivity side" of advancements at the plant, according to Watson.
Unlike the mechanical pan-stacking, storage and retrieval systems used for years in commercial bakeries, the Bloomfield installation relies on articulated arms to gently handle an inventory of 26,000 pans. Nine workers were replaced and one-third the floor space was required compared to a retired plant. A smaller version of the system was installed three years ago at a Mrs. Baird's Bakery in Texas by Emtrol Inc., a now-defunct material-handling firm. As physically imposing as the robots are, the software and controls architecture that manages the system is the greatest advancement.
"The fewer decisions the robots had to make, the more reliable the system would be," explains Jeremy Kopicz, a former Emtrol engineer who helped execute the integration project with Lancaster, PA-based Genesys Controls Corp. The ABB robots came with their own controls and proprietary code. They also had DeviceNet cards, and that facilitated integration of the units with PLCs that also manage a dozen varieties of pans and operator inputs. "DeviceNet was critical for doing real-time control and physically controlling the robots, not just feeding them a profile," says Kopicz.
I spy moldy friesTo hold down costs, articulated arm robots typically are not equipped with sensor technology. The arms travel a preprogrammed path regardless of any obstructions, human or otherwise. OSHA began assessing fines two years ago for plants that failed to comply with the safety-circuit design guidelines and other aspects of ANSI/RIA 15.06-1999. The revised safety standards are designed to isolate the machines in restricted work zones.
Worker injuries are less likely if a machine is equipped with vision, and vision-guided robots are coming into their own. They also are expanding applications into the processing areas of food plants, adding increasingly sophisticated quality inspections to rapid-motion tasks. In recent years, major potato processors have experimented with vision as a quality check on French fries being conveyed from storage to packaging. Vision systems proved adept at spotting fries with mold, but removing them begged for a robotics solution that wasn't available. Collaborations between robotics and vision experts are intended to close the gap.
More often than not, collaboration depends on an integrator, and it is the integrator's decision on whose robot to use with which vision system. BluePrint Robotic Solutions in Boulder, CO, recently designated Cognex Corp.'s In-Sight vision sensor as its system of choice for high-speed robotics. BluePrint also is an integrator for ABB, which no longer develops robotic solutions for non-automotive applications. BluePrint works primarily with Delta-style robots, the metallic spider arms used frequently for pick-and-place. ABB and SIG/Doboy are the primary suppliers of Delta parallel-axis robots.
ABB's Delta robots can pick up to 150 pieces per minute, and picking them off a moving conveyor and in a random orientation requires a vision system that not only processes images quickly but also judges distances. Cognex made the transition in 1997 from pixel-by-pixel comparison to geometric pattern matching, or 3-D imaging. According to BluePrint's Joe Crompton, director of software and controls, "even their base model can keep a robot supplied with well over 200 targets per minute.
"Food and beverage is one of the biggest segments in robotics vision," he adds, "and the potential is huge."
Faster processing speeds have resulted in a single camera serving four or more robots in some applications. Two years ago, a dedicated camera for each robot was the rule of thumb. Inconsistent lighting and surface finishes on packages still pose challenges, Crompton says, but today's systems are expanding their role in quality-assurance, particularly in the handling of raw foods such as frozen entrees. His firm recently designed a vision-guided, tray-loading robot that works in a freezer.
While working at TechniStar, Crompton helped integrate vision-guided robots on Pepperidge Farm's Milano cookie line in the late 1980s. Inspection functions were "rudimentary" at that time. "Now we're getting into recognizing shapes, whether product is broken or the right color, and it's done with vision systems that cost less," he says.
Adept Technology Inc. provided the vision-guided robots in the earliest Milano applications. "Compared to then, vision systems are probably five to ten times faster now, costs are down substantially and cycle rates are going up," reports John Dulchinos, general manager of the Livermore, CA, firm's robotics division. With 3-D vision, overlapping cookies on a moving belt no longer pose a problem, he says. Speeds have more than doubled to 100 to 130 parts per minute.
A washdown-ready, IP67 certified robot for handling raw meat was developed in the early 1990s, but cost resulted in few sales, Dulchinos recalls. Suppliers continue to work on cleanable robots for heavy washdown environments, with modest success. FANUC has a system in Europe for butchering meat. "Will it be here in a year? No," says senior engineer Matt Job. "Will it be here in five to ten years? Definitely."
FANUC has two installations using a "robosuit," stainless-steel cladding to protect a robot that cuts pork bellies, Job says. "Everybody could make stainless-steel robots, but nobody could afford to buy them," he points out. FANUC hopes to engineer a system that eliminates crevices that can harbor bacteria, drains after washdown, meets 3A specifications for the gripping arm and uses food-grade lubricants. Processors also need to modify their practices, such as switching to less caustic chemicals and foams when cleaning and sanitizing the units.
Mobile robots in the form of automated guided vehicles have been serving food and beverage processors since the 1980s. Early systems relied on wires to guide vehicles from pallet wrapping stations to AS/RS storage racks or truckload staging areas. Wireless inertial guidance systems replaced wires a decade ago, according to Mike Kotecki, senior vice president of HK Systems, and the technology continues to evolve, with encoder guidance systems, triangulation off-laser positioning and laser bumpers that allow vehicles to go into tight spaces previously off limits and reduce the likelihood of contact with humans and other objects.
"Control logic has improved tremendously, allowing manufacturers to operate with fewer vehicles and, thererfore, at a lower cost," Kotecki adds. Users include Keebler, Coca-Cola and Miller Brewing.
Though suppliers have made vast improvements, durability and controls integration continue to be a drag on widespread use. Adept recently addressed the second issue with a servo architecture that uses a DF-1 serial connection on Allen-Bradley PLCs. It allows users to program and control the robots from the PLC with a minimum of wiring. While much slower than Ethernet, the connection simplifies start-up and changeover for most applications.
Durability is relative. "We have conventional palletizers out there that are 30 years old," notes Alvey's Wohlrab. "I just don't see the longevity of robots beyond 10 years."
Durability has not been an issue at Pepperidge Farm. Though units have been rebuilt and upgraded over the years, 18 SCARA arms with almost 60,000 hours of service continue to execute delicate procedures at the company's Willard, OH, plant, Watson reports.
ROI on that automation investment occurred long ago, and maintenance clearly hasn't been a stumbling block. "From a mechanical standpoint, there is nothing in a robot that is beyond what a food plant can handle," Adept's Dulchinos says. "The controls and software, on the other hand, may be quite different."
Given the state of automation throughout the food industry, controls and software maintenance are entering a comfort zone for many plant engineers. The real question is economics: have robot costs declined sufficiently to produce quick ROI compared to labor costs and repetitive-motion injury claims? At an increasing number of plants, they have.
For more information:
Mike Crane, ABB Inc., 262-785-3566
John Dulchinos, Adept Technology Inc., 408-432-0888
Earl Wohlrab, Alvey Systems Inc., 314-993-4700
Joe Crompton, BluePrint Robotics Solutions, 303-581-9600, ext. 222
John Lewis, Cognex, 508-650-3140,
Matt Job, FANUC Robotics America Inc., 248-276-4123
Jeremy Kopicz, Genesys Controls Corp., 717-291-1116
Mike Kotecki, HK Systems, 262-860-6769,
Izzat Hammad, Schneider Packaging Equipment Co., 315-676-3035
Visionary robot-users in foodWhile food and beverage processors are only one part of the $280 million non-automotive robotics market, they represent one of the fastest-growing segments. And food processors increasingly are incorporating vision systems in their robots: food companies increased spending on vision systems 7 percent in a flat overall market last year, according to analyst Nello Zuech of Vision Systems International, and part of that spending was incorporated into $15 to $20 million worth of vision-guided robots.
The automotive industry continues to dominate in robotics automation. Ann Arbor, MI-based Robotic Industries Association (RIA) estimates two-thirds of robots still go into automotive applications, and the needs of those manufacturers are driving the technology. Arc- and spot-welding robots constitute 45 percent of all applications, with material handling representing another 37 percent. RIA estimates 135,000 robots are currently used in US factories, second only to the Japanese industrial market.