Manufacturing News

Are you best-in-class or a laggard?

March 1, 2007
/ Print / Reprints /
ShareMore
/ Text Size+




Most studies are based on interviewees’ conjecture and opinion. But a best-in-class benchmark report of food and beverage packaging operations conducted by Informance sampled actual production data from customers’ 141 packaging lines worldwide using the company’s Enterprise Manufacturing Intelligence Suite. The study reveals polar results. For example, best-in-class manufacturers are 22% more productive because they identify manufacturing losses at a rate 45 times greater than laggard processors. Why? Successful manufacturers are able to measure, manage and mitigate the problems that result in capacity loss, quality loss and poor asset utilization.


Manufacturers typically achieve competitive advantage by concentrating on “operational excellence” initiatives, which include Six Sigma, lean manufacturing, total productive maintenance and other continuous improvement approaches. Manufacturers want to unlock capacity, reduce inventory and labor costs while they increase productivity without additional expense.  To meet these goals, processors measure key performance indicators (KPIs).
Packaging lines in the food and beverage industry incur more than 18,000 interruptions of less than ten minutes each per year, an equivalent of seven per hour. Best-in-class manufacturers approach 80% overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) with asset utilization rates as high as 97%. Laggards’ OEE was typically in the 25 to 35% range with asset utilization hovering around 27%. OEE, operational availability and asset utilization were top KPIs used in the study to determine best-in-class lines.
To determine a processor’s competitive position, each KPI from each company was ranked from best to worst score. Organizations in the top 20th percentile were defined best-in-class, the middle 50th percentile as average and the bottom 30th percentile as laggards. Based on best practices from TPM practitioners, the study defines a set of six loss categories for the food and beverage industry. To read the executive summary, visit www.informance.com/FoodPack.  

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Food Engineering Magazine.

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

Fabulous Food Plant: Paramount Citrus

Learn more about this fabulous food plant in Food Engineering's article, found here.

Podcasts

Burns & McDonnell project manager RJ Hope and senior project engineer Justin Hamilton discuss the distinctions between Food Safety and Food Defense as well as the implications for food manufacturers of the Food Safety Modernization Act.
More Podcasts

THE MAGAZINE

Food Engineering Magazine

Food engineering magazine 2014 april cover

2014 April

Catch a preview of the Powder and Bulk Show in this April 2014 edition of Food Engineering. Also, be sure to check out a coffee stick making a real stir and a major advancement in the the pet food industry.
Table Of Contents Subscribe

THE FOOD ENGINEERING STORE

Food-Authentication-Flyer-(.gif
Food Authentication Using Bioorganic Molecules

This text provides critical tools and data needed to augment routine food analysis and enhance food safety by aiding in the detection of counterfeit, and potentially deleterious, foods.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

Food Master

Food Master Cover 2014Food Master 2014 is now available!

 

Where the buying process begins in the food and beverage manufacturing market. 

Visit www.foodmaster.com to learn more.

STAY CONNECTED

FE recent tweets

facebook_40.pngtwitter_40px.pngyoutube_40px.pnglinkedin_40px.png