Columns

If you use metal detectors, don't go it alone

September 20, 2005
/ Print / Reprints /
ShareMore
/ Text Size+
Understanding your equipment's capabilities up front keeps food safe and makes manufacturing easier.

Richard F. Stier
In the last few years, I've been in many plants and have seen staff fighting more than one battle with the facility's metal detectors. In each of these cases, the problems stemmed from the plant trying to commission and/or operate the metal detector on its own. But the time, effort and aggravation experienced by plant staff could have been alleviated with a single call to the equipment vendor.



Metal detection has become an integral part of most food processing operations. In fact, many companies mandate every ingredient they buy must be run through a metal detection system. This business practice can protect raw materials, finished goods and your brand.

But how do you choose the right metal detector? They may be used to detect metal in liquid systems, powders that flow, pieces of meat, fruit or vegetables and packaged products. To select the right tool for the right application, processors must understand not only their products but also the capabilities of metal detection technology.

The very nature of some products can cause a metal detector to reject them and interfere with the detector's sensitivity. Products that may cause this kind of reaction-known as a "product effect"-are those with high moisture content such as meat, cheese, warm bread, fresh produce and most liquids. The detector can be adjusted to minimize this effect, but its achievable sensitivity will be reduced.

Low-moisture products such as cookies, fried snacks, sugars and cereals have little product effect and can operate at greater sensitivities. Frozen foods also have little product effect since their moisture is bound up.



To select the right tool for the right application, processors must understand not only their products but also the capabilities of metal detection technology. Source: Thermo Electron.
Processors can come up against challenges when they try to install detectors on their own. For example, one company decided to run all of its finished products through a metal detector. This processor manufactured a wide range of products (300 SKUs) and decided to pass cased goods through the detector prior to palletizing. The processor's client had standards of 1.0 mm for ferrous and 1.5 mm for non-ferrous. The processor unsuccessfully tried to make the unit work for the standards. When the processor finally called the metal detector company, the service representative said the unit simply could not run at the desired sensitivities. The rep sent a letter describing the minimum operating parameters for the unit given the products the processor was running. The processor shared the letter with its client, who granted a waiver to operate at lower sensitivities for its products.

In another example, a processor decided to install a metal detector on a line handling sauces with particulates. The processor did the set-up on its own and adjusted the sensitivities to the lowest possible detection limit. This operation also had problems. With the supplier's help, the processor adjusted the sensitivity upward and made changes to the software, solving the problems.

With metal detection becoming mandatory, processors must do everything they can to get their systems working properly from the very beginning. This means understanding products and the basic principles of metal detection and taking advantage of the expertise offered by suppliers. Remember one of the primary corollaries to Murphy's Law: "There is never time to do it right, but there is always time to do it again."

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Food Engineering Magazine.

Recent Articles by Richard Stier, Contributing Editor

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

Fabulous Food Plant: Paramount Citrus

Learn more about this fabulous food plant in Food Engineering's article, found here.

Podcasts

Burns & McDonnell project manager RJ Hope and senior project engineer Justin Hamilton discuss the distinctions between Food Safety and Food Defense as well as the implications for food manufacturers of the Food Safety Modernization Act.
More Podcasts

What was your favorite part of FA&M 2014?

View Results Poll Archive

THE MAGAZINE

Food Engineering Magazine

Food engineering magazine 2014 april cover

2014 April

Catch a preview of the Powder and Bulk Show in this April 2014 edition of Food Engineering. Also, be sure to check out a coffee stick making a real stir and a major advancement in the the pet food industry.
Table Of Contents Subscribe

THE FOOD ENGINEERING STORE

Food-Authentication-Flyer-(.gif
Food Authentication Using Bioorganic Molecules

This text provides critical tools and data needed to augment routine food analysis and enhance food safety by aiding in the detection of counterfeit, and potentially deleterious, foods.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

Food Master

Food Master Cover 2014Food Master 2014 is now available!

 

Where the buying process begins in the food and beverage manufacturing market. 

Visit www.foodmaster.com to learn more.

STAY CONNECTED

FE recent tweets

facebook_40.pngtwitter_40px.pngyoutube_40px.pnglinkedin_40px.png