Food Safety

FSIS announces verification of product formulation and labeling for most common food allergens

Undeclared allergens are the result of a failure in hazard analysis.

FSIS announces verification of product formulation and labeling for most common food allergens

USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service released a document containing instructions for inspection program personnel (IPP) to make sure facilities are labeling the eight most common food allergens accurately.

The “Big 8,” designated major food allergens by the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA) of 2004, are largely responsible for a sustained increase in the number of recalls of FSIS-regulated products between 2008 and 2012. An FSIS investigation into the rise in undeclared allergen recalls found most issues occurred due to a change in ingredient supplier, products in the wrong package or changes to product or ingredient formulation.

Recognizing this trend, FSIS specifically expanded its verification mandate for IPP to include not just foodborne illness testing but also labeling of all allergenic products. FSIS says the move is necessary to combat the increase in recalls due to undeclared allergens. Big 8 allergens include: wheat, crustacean shellfish, eggs, fish, peanuts, milk, tree nuts and soybeans.

When a product with an undeclared allergen is released into commerce, an establishment has failed to address the chemical food safety hazard in its hazard analysis, failed to support the decisions made in the hazard analysis or failed to effectively implement the necessary controls to support the hazard analysis.

FSIS urges inspection personnel to discuss with operators whether a facility uses any of the Big 8 allergens. If none are in use at the facility, inspection personnel should discuss the importance of identifying allergens before randomly selecting a product produced there and verifying the finished product list of ingredients matches the formulation.

IPP should also ask if the facility has implemented an allergen control plan, if any multi-ingredient compounds used at the facility are manufactured elsewhere, if any products containing allergens had a change in supplier or formulation in the previous six months and where product labels are printed. IPP should verify labeling matches product formulations, as well as inform establishment management of FSIS labeling compliance guides and allergen compliance assistance documents available online.

FSIS also instructed IPP to conduct a “Big 8 Formulation Verification,” where the ingredient formulation of a product containing a Big 8 allergen is verified. If a facility produces multiple products containing different Big 8 allergens, IPP should use a chart outlining priorities in selecting the product for verification.

Top priority goes to a product  that had a change in its ingredient supplier in the last six months. Second priority goes to a product with an ingredient that has changed in the last six months. The third priority goes to a product that incorporates a multi-ingredient component produced outside the establishment. If none of the facility’s products meet these criteria, IPP should choose the product produced in the largest quantity at that facility.

IPP should also contact suppliers to confirm “may contain” and “produced in the facility as” statements regarding Big 8 allergens are included on the final label, except when an establishment contacts a supplier for written confirmation such an ingredient is not present in the product and includes a written statement in its hazard analysis explaining why the warning isn’t included on a finished meat or poultry label.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Food Engineering Magazine.

You must login or register in order to post a comment.



Image Galleries

Plant of the Year 2015

Mars Chocolate was chosen as Food Engineering’s 2015 Plant of the Year. The first new Mars candy plant in North America in 35 years is not only LEED Gold certified, it’s highly automated as well.


Burns & McDonnell project manager RJ Hope and senior project engineer Justin Hamilton discuss the distinctions between Food Safety and Food Defense as well as the implications for food manufacturers of the Food Safety Modernization Act.
More Podcasts

Food Engineering

Food Engineering April 2015 Cover

2015 April

The April 2014 issue of Food Engineering features the Plant of the Year: Mars Chocolate. The first new Mars chocolate candy plant in North America in 35 years is not only LEED Gold certified, it’s highly automated as well.

Table Of Contents Subscribe

Plant Facility/Site Issues

What issue about your current plant facility/site keeps you up the most at night?
View Results Poll Archive


Food Authentication Using Bioorganic Molecules

This text provides critical tools and data needed to augment routine food analysis and enhance food safety by aiding in the detection of counterfeit, and potentially deleterious, foods.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.


FE recent tweets

facebook_40.pngtwitter_40px.pngyoutube_40px.png linkedin_40px.pngGoogle +

Food Master

Food Engineering Food Master 2015Food Master 2015 is now available!

Where the buying process begins in the food and beverage manufacturing market. 

Visit to learn more.