Manufacturing News

Large firms best positioned to improve profit margins

As US consumers become more health conscious, large companies are able to offer new products at increased prices.

Large firms best positioned to improve profit margins

New research suggests as US consumers become more health conscious, large, established brands are better positioned to realize higher profit margins than smaller competitors. The bigger companies are able to offer new, healthier at an increased price without decreasing demand because consumers expect healthy food to be more expensive, and they already trust the brand’s quality.

According to Jeffrey Cohen of the industry analysis firm IBISWorld, a growing number of US consumers with preventable conditions like diabetes and heart disease have sought out healthier versions of favorite brands instead of giving up certain foods entirely. As a result, producers in candy, cereal, meat production and other sectors have increased advertising based on health claims. Examples include Cadbury’s Strike Spark, a chewing gum that contains 25 percent of the daily recommended intake of vitamins B6 and B12, and Kellogg’s Kashi cereal line, which contains whole grains and protein. Cohen sees the trend toward healthier foods going forward as the media continue to report on the health effects of certain unhealthy foods.

Cohen’s article lists the top 10 most profitable food industries in terms of revenue, average profit and overall risk. The ranking looks like this, from most to least profitable: chicken and turkey meat production ($29.2B annual revenue, 23.0 percent average profit, 5.17 percent overall risk); ice cream production ($8.7B, 23.0 percent, 5.15 percent); sugar processing ($9.9B, 18.5 percent, 4.41 percent); candy production ($7.3B, 17.2 percent, 5.31 percent); chocolate production ($15.7B, 16.4 percent, 5.26 percent); cereal production ($11.7B, 13.3 percent, 5.01 percent); seasoning, sauce and condiment production ($18.2B, 13 percent, 5.84 percent); meat, beef and poultry processing ($221.8B, 12.6 percent, 4.24 percent); snack food production ($31.4B, 12.2 percent, 4.73 percent); and cookie, cracker and pasta production ($23.5B, 9.4 percent, 4.74 percent).

Commodity prices play an important role in the price of food goods, and larger companies may be more successful in passing along unexpected cost increases to the consumer than smaller companies. For example, cereal production for Kellogg’s and PepsiCo generate profit margins of 17.9 percent and 19.0 percent respectively, far outstripping the industry average of 13.3 percent. Some smaller producers are even forced to exit the market altogether when commodity prices spike. Larger producers are also able to invest in new equipment and machinery, which can help expand profit margins through greater efficiency and decreased wage costs.

Less volatile commodity prices are expected to characterize the next five years, presenting an opportunity to increase profit margins further. Most important, according to Cohen, is an expected reversal in the trajectory of the price of corn from a 6.7 percent annualized ascent over the past five years to an annualized decline of 2.6 percent over the next five. Because feed prices are tied to corn, the chicken and turkey production industry and the meat and beef processing industry will be able to cut production costs. The result is an expected bump in average profit margins to 23.3 percent and 12.8 percent respectively.

As US consumers continue to seek out healthier alternatives to favorite foods, and commodity markets become less volatile, food and beverage producers may have an opportunity to increase profit margins. Larger companies may be better equipped to take advantage of these new opportunities in the market as consumers stay loyal to favorite brands and economies of scale produce savings.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Food Engineering Magazine.

Recent Articles by Shane O'Halloran

You must login or register in order to post a comment.



Image Galleries

Food Engineering's Food Automation & Manufacturing Conference and Expo 2015

Images from Food Engineering's Food Automation & Manufacturing Conference and Expo in Clearwater Beach, Florida, April 12-15, 2015. The event brought food and beverage processors and suppliers together to gain valuable information on the latest trends and technologies in manufacturing, automation, sustainability and food safety.


Burns & McDonnell project manager RJ Hope and senior project engineer Justin Hamilton discuss the distinctions between Food Safety and Food Defense as well as the implications for food manufacturers of the Food Safety Modernization Act.
More Podcasts

Food Engineering

Food Engineering May 2015 Cover

2015 May

The May 2015 issue of Food Engineering explores effective tools for hitting manufacturing targets. Also, read how processors are looking for faster ways to detect harmful pathogens in food and beverages without sacrificing accuracy or reliability.

Table Of Contents Subscribe

Plant Facility/Site Issues

What issue about your current plant facility/site keeps you up the most at night?
View Results Poll Archive


Food Authentication Using Bioorganic Molecules

This text provides critical tools and data needed to augment routine food analysis and enhance food safety by aiding in the detection of counterfeit, and potentially deleterious, foods.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.


FE recent tweets

facebook_40.pngtwitter_40px.pngyoutube_40px.png linkedin_40px.pngGoogle +

Food Master

Food Engineering Food Master 2015Food Master 2015 is now available!

Where the buying process begins in the food and beverage manufacturing market. 

Visit to learn more.