Food Safety / Processing
TECH FLASH

Maltodextrin: Are you prepared for dust explosions?

Maltodextrin is a useful additive, but it comes with some plant safety risks.

November 12, 2013

Maltodextrin is an oligosaccharide that is used as a food additive. Produced from starch by partial hydrolysis,   it is usually found as a combustible/explosible, white, hygroscopic spray-dried powder. While maltodextrin offers many useful applications in the food industry, the risk of explosion associated with it is high. We asked Steven J. Luzik, senior process safety specialist at Chilworth Technology, about dust explosions, maltodextrin and plant safety.

Maltodextrin: Are you prepared for dust explosions?
Steve Lusik of Chilworth Technology shares information and best practices for maltodextrin handling.

 

Q: How does this powder compare with others in terms of explosivity?

A: According to published data, the explosion properties of maltodextrin vary with particle size, moisture content and the source of the material, as is usual for these properties. But generally speaking, the maximum explosion pressure, Pmax, is between 7.5 and 8.5 bar, and the deflagration index (Kst value) is up to about 135 bar.m/s. This makes maltodextrin a “typical” agricultural product with explosion severity data comparable to, for example, many starches and sugars, but higher than, for example, wheat flour.

 

Q: How easily can this product be set off by static charges—either from the movement of the powder itself or by other sources of static electricity?

A: The Minimum Ignition Energy (MIE) can be less than 10 mJ,  making maltodextrin easily ignitable by electrostatic discharges with energies of 10 mJ or more. Movement of the powder can generate static charge, but a discharge from the powder would not be expected to ignite a dust cloud. However, movement of the powder can also lead to charge accumulation on ungrounded (metal) equipment, and (spark) discharges from such equipment can easily ignite a dust cloud with this level of sensitivity. In addition, when operators become electrostatically charged, they can create sparks that are incendive for sensitive powders like maltodextrin.

 

 

Q: What are the mistakes in handling this product that could potentially result in an explosion?

A: Where the product is transferred pneumatically, the piping must be adequately bonded and grounded. Flexible hoses, which are part of pneumatic transfer lines, are usually not conductive or anti-static, and this allows for a buildup of charge and development of propagating brush discharges inside them. Propagating brush discharges can readily ignite dust clouds such as maltodextrin. Inadequately grounded personnel involved in manually transferring the powder also could be a source of electrostatic discharge/ignition for an explosible maltodextrin dust cloud. 

 

Q: What should processors do to make sure they are safely handling this product?

A: It is very important that process hazard assessments (PHAs) be conducted by individuals with a proper understanding of, and competency in, identifying all the situations that could give rise to flash fires and explosions under both normal and abnormal operating conditions. Plus, they must be able to recommend practical measures for eliminating or managing those hazards. Also, the PHA must be based on relevant, applicable process safety information including all the flammability, explosibility, self-heating and electrostatic characteristics of the powder that is being processed.

 

Q: What hardware upgrades to existing equipment can relieve the danger of an explosion?

A: Measures such as the good bonding and grounding of all conductive parts, as well as suitable explosion protection measures for all silos, filter receivers and dust collection equipment, are necessary. But, as I mentioned earlier, any hardware upgrade must begin with a process hazard assessment, based on relevant, applicable process safety information and conducted by individuals who have the proper competency.  

 

Q: What type of training should be provided to assure workers are following  safety precautions?

A: Workers should receive training on combustible dust fire and explosion hazards, electrostatics hazards, how to select electrical equipment for use in hazardous locations, management of change and how to collect, use and evaluate process safety information.

 

Q: Since many food processors don’t think about the danger of dust explosions until one happens, how do you convince them to take action?

A: There have been some very significant dust explosions in the US in the past few years, resulting in significant loss of life and property. All these events have been well publicized by both private and public organizations such as OSHA and the Chemical Safety Board. Therefore, all companies involved in handling, processing, packaging, storing and transporting particulate solids must already be well aware of dust explosion hazards. The issue is that they need to take action and implement proven measures to ensure safety. 

 

Q: What can an audit reveal about a potential maltodextrin explosion?

A: An audit can uncover deficiencies in fire, explosion, self-heating and electrostatic data; inadequate or improper training of personnel; issues-related equipment design; inadequate explosion protection; inadequate control of ignition sources;  housekeeping deficiencies; and more.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Food Engineering Magazine.

Recent Articles by Shane O'Halloran

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

Plant of the Year 2014

Blue Diamond Growers was chosen as Food Engineering's 2014 Plant of the Year. The Sacramento-based company is the world’s largest producer of almonds and almond ingredients.

Podcasts

Burns & McDonnell project manager RJ Hope and senior project engineer Justin Hamilton discuss the distinctions between Food Safety and Food Defense as well as the implications for food manufacturers of the Food Safety Modernization Act.
More Podcasts

TYSON FOODS

Tyson Foods made headlines announcing the company intends to acquire Hillshire Brands in a deal valued at $8.55 billion. Do you think the acquisition for will be beneficial for meat and poultry processors?
View Results Poll Archive

Food Engineering

July 2014

2014 July

The July 2014 issue of Food Engineering features the 12th Annual Replacement Parts Survey. Also covered: OEE improvement steps and increased filtration cycle.

Table Of Contents Subscribe

THE FOOD ENGINEERING STORE

Food-Authentication-Flyer-(.gif
Food Authentication Using Bioorganic Molecules

This text provides critical tools and data needed to augment routine food analysis and enhance food safety by aiding in the detection of counterfeit, and potentially deleterious, foods.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

Food Master

Food Master Cover 2014Food Master 2014 is now available!

Where the buying process begins in the food and beverage manufacturing market. 

Visit www.foodmaster.com to learn more.

STAY CONNECTED

FE recent tweets

facebook_40.pngtwitter_40px.pngyoutube_40px.png linkedin_40px.pngGoogle +