Let your voice be heard

September 1, 2009
/ Print / Reprints /
/ Text Size+
Share your thoughts on the forthcoming GMPs and help establish regulations that will meet the needs of all involved.

It has been almost four years since FDA released a document titled “Food CGMP Modernization - A Focus on Food Safety,” drafted by the CFSAN Food CGMP Modernization Working Group. More recently, the group was charged with examining the current good manufacturing practices (GMP) found in 21 CFR Part 110 and determining if regulations need to be updated. A second charge was to examine risk-based preventive controls, in other words controls that would have the greatest impact on food safety.

The working group determined that due to changes in the food industry and food safety, GMPs should be modernized. It identified seven areas in which regulation could be updated:

1. Mandate that supervisors and workers have the necessary knowledge and expertise in food hygiene, food protection, employee health and personal hygiene to ensure the production of safe foods. This training must be delivered in a manner that is understood by management and staff, and it must be documented.

2. All processors that manufacture foods containing one or more allergens must develop an allergen control program. The plan must include six basic elements: training of processing and supervisory personnel, segregation of food allergens during storage and handling, validating cleaning procedures for food contact equipment, prevention of cross-contact during processing, product label review and label usage and control, and a supplier control program for ingredients and labels.

3. Producers of ready-to-eat foods who support the growth of Listeria monocytogenes must develop and implement an environmental monitoring program. The control program must address the risks posed in processing and packaging operations. In addition, the program must include microbiological monitoring of the processing and packaging environment.  Records must be maintained that demonstrate the efficacy of the program.

4. Food processors will be required to develop, document and maintain sanitation procedures. These procedures must include the scope of the program, sanitation objectives, management responsibility, monitoring programs, corrective actions and records that demonstrate the efficacy of the program.

5. Additional comments should be gathered on whether to maintain the exclusion from following the cGMPs currently in place for processors involved in the harvest, storage and distribution of raw agricultural commodities.

6. Mandate that all processors maintain records for complying with GMPs. These records should be available for review by FDA investigators.

7. Further comments and suggestions should be obtained on the use of time-temperature relationships for incorporation into regulations or guidance for proper refrigerated storage or hot holding.

FDA is working on a proposal to modernize existing GMPs based on these seven areas. This document should be published by late 2009 or early 2010.

What does this mean to the food industry? Our regulatory system is unique in that we have the right to comment on any proposed regulation. This helps ensure that the final regulation is something that the industry can live with. 

But, is it worth making a comment? Does FDA actually read the submissions? Absolutely!  For example, when the seafood HACCP regulation was finalized in December 1995, some points in the final regulation were not in the original proposal. FDA originally proposed that consumer complaint files would be available for examination by investigators. The industry adamantly opposed this and FDA complied.

Food processors should take a serious look at the working group’s original report and be prepared to comment when the proposal is issued. The proposed changes will give FDA more power to examine records. The modernized GMPs will have a significant impact on the relationship between the industry and FDA, and it will be no surprise if the industry pushes for an extended comment period.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Food Engineering Magazine.

You must login or register in order to post a comment.



Image Galleries

Fabulous Food Plant: Paramount Citrus

Learn more about this fabulous food plant in Food Engineering's article, found here.


Burns & McDonnell project manager RJ Hope and senior project engineer Justin Hamilton discuss the distinctions between Food Safety and Food Defense as well as the implications for food manufacturers of the Food Safety Modernization Act.
More Podcasts


Food Engineering Magazine

Food engineering magazine 2014 april cover

2014 April

Catch a preview of the Powder and Bulk Show in this April 2014 edition of Food Engineering. Also, be sure to check out a coffee stick making a real stir and a major advancement in the the pet food industry.
Table Of Contents Subscribe


Food Authentication Using Bioorganic Molecules

This text provides critical tools and data needed to augment routine food analysis and enhance food safety by aiding in the detection of counterfeit, and potentially deleterious, foods.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

Food Master

Food Master Cover 2014Food Master 2014 is now available!


Where the buying process begins in the food and beverage manufacturing market. 

Visit to learn more.


FE recent tweets