Columns

Food Safety: Will ‘Reportable Food Registry' law make food safer?

January 1, 2010
/ Print / Reprints /
ShareMore
/ Text Size+
All processors must understand their responsibilities under this new mandate.



Last September, the food industry received a new burden. In response to a loss of public confidence in the food supply, Congress amended the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act to better protect the public health. The mandate’s intent was to “provide a reliable mechanism to track patterns of adulteration in food in order to support efforts by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to target limited inspection resources to protect the public health.”

Included are three basic mandates that require:

• FDA will establish a Reportable Food Registry, to which instances of reportable food may be submitted via an electronic portal and a unique number issued to the person submitting the report upon receipt.

• Facilities that manufacture, process or hold food for consumption in the US report to FDA within 24 hours if they find a reasonable probability that an article of food will cause severe health problems or death to a person or animal.

• Responsible party - the facility that manufactures, processes or holds food for consumption in the US - must investigate the issue, submit initial information and supplemental reports and work with the FDA to follow-up as needed.

You may be wondering how “responsible party” and “reportable food” are defined. The former is the person (defined as individuals, partnerships, corporations or associations) who submits the registration for a food facility at which food is manufactured, processed, packed or held. This includes domestic and foreign companies manufacturing, processing, packing, or holding food for consumption in the US. A reportable food is an article of food for which there is a reasonable probability that the use of, or exposure to, it will cause serious, adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals. Reportable foods include those under FDA jurisdiction. Examples include foods contaminated with glass, under-processed low-acid canned foods and products with undeclared allergens. However, a report to FDA through the new portal is not an admission that the food is adulterated or caused or contributed to illness.

The responsible party would not be required to report a food if it meets the following criteria:

• If the adulteration originated with the responsible party;

• The responsible party detected the adulteration prior to any transfer to another person of such article of food; and

• The responsible party corrected such adulteration; or destroyed or caused the destruction of such article of food.

If a food or ingredient manufacturer, processor or warehouse operation finds that a food they have had under its control is potentially hazardous, it must report the incident through the Reportable Food Registry within 24 hours. The responsible party must also notify any operation that has received the reportable food, and any previous sources.

Whether the Reportable Food Registry will enhance food safety remains to be seen. This law will put increased pressure on not only the food processing and warehousing industry, but supporting industries such as testing laboratories. If labs report back to the customer that samples contained a microorganism of public health significance, the reporting and notification merry-go-round will start. Think of the havoc that a false positive could cause or what would happen if a lab failed to find something that is detected later. 

The Reportable Food Registry is accessible at http://rfr.fda.gov/. A Guidance document that is accessible at http://www.fda.gov/Food/Guidance ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidance Documents/FoodSafety/ucm180761.htm.  

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Food Engineering Magazine.

Recent Articles by Richard Stier, Contributing Editor

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

Fabulous Food Plant: Paramount Citrus

Learn more about this fabulous food plant in Food Engineering's article, found here.

Podcasts

Burns & McDonnell project manager RJ Hope and senior project engineer Justin Hamilton discuss the distinctions between Food Safety and Food Defense as well as the implications for food manufacturers of the Food Safety Modernization Act.
More Podcasts

What was your favorite part of FA&M 2014?

View Results Poll Archive

THE MAGAZINE

Food Engineering Magazine

Food engineering magazine 2014 april cover

2014 April

Catch a preview of the Powder and Bulk Show in this April 2014 edition of Food Engineering. Also, be sure to check out a coffee stick making a real stir and a major advancement in the the pet food industry.
Table Of Contents Subscribe

THE FOOD ENGINEERING STORE

Food-Authentication-Flyer-(.gif
Food Authentication Using Bioorganic Molecules

This text provides critical tools and data needed to augment routine food analysis and enhance food safety by aiding in the detection of counterfeit, and potentially deleterious, foods.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

Food Master

Food Master Cover 2014Food Master 2014 is now available!

 

Where the buying process begins in the food and beverage manufacturing market. 

Visit www.foodmaster.com to learn more.

STAY CONNECTED

FE recent tweets

facebook_40.pngtwitter_40px.pngyoutube_40px.pnglinkedin_40px.png