Columns

Editor's Note: Become a contender

March 22, 2003
/ Print / Reprints /
ShareMore
/ Text Size+
Nearly 20 years ago, Food Engineering launched an annual awards competition to honor outstanding process and facility design in the food plant environment. The thinking was simply this: We learn best by observing what is good. And what better means of spreading the word than showcasing the winning plant in the pages of Food Engineering?

The winner of the first New Food Plant of the Year competition was a modest little company named Campbell Soup. Since then, the competition has gone on to honor companies like Anheuser-Busch and Frito Lay, General Mills and Pepperidge Farm, Nabisco and the Dannon Company.

As this month's cover shows, the winner of the 2001 New Plant of the Year Award is Canadian-based Mother Parkers Tea & Coffee USA Ltd. If you're not familiar with the name Mother Parkers, you're probably not alone. If you are familiar with it, you're probably from Canada, where the 89-year-old company is the country's top supplier of coffee and one of its leading suppliers of tea. In addition to its own brands, which include Higgins and Burke and its namesake, Mother Parkers Coffee and Mother Parkers Tea, the company produces private label brands for a number of lines, including President's Choice.

Mother Parkers has made significant inroads into the U.S. market in the last decade, and the plant we've honored this year is a 100,000-sq.-ft. facility in Fort Worth, Texas, capable of roasting, grinding, blending and packaging private label coffees at a rate of 20 million tons per year. Just as impressive, the plant was designed and constructed in just nine months, despite heavy rainstorms and other construction challenges. Of course, expert help is required to meet that demanding of a schedule, and Mother Parkers got it from both design/build firm The Austin Company, which designed and constructed the Fort Worth facility, and Probat-Werke of Emmerich, Germany, which supplied the plant's roasting, grinding, blending and handling equipment.

Rather than steal any more of our own thunder, I'll just refer you to page 30 of this issue, where you can read Senior Editor Chuck Morris's report on this complex and fascinating facility.

But to provide a little context for the Mother Parkers honor, I'd like to tell you how plants are selected for the award. Each December, we issue a call for entries requesting information on any new food plant or major plant retrofit that became fully operational during that calendar year. Any company can submit an entry, as long as the plant in question produces processed food products designed for human consumption.

Plant submissions are essentially evaluated according to the following four criteria:

1) The plant's contribution (actual/projected) to the company's long-term business strategies.

2) The level of innovation in processing and packaging line design, as well as post-production materials handling.

3) Building and site innovations.

4) Productive integration of workers into the plan.

If your plant excels in those four areas, and you can document it, then you've definitely got a contender on your hands. In addition to processors, any design firm, construction firm, supplier -- or any others qualified to provide a detailed account of a particular plant -- may submit an entry.

One more thing: Any plant entered in the competition must be available for a plant visit in the late winter or early spring. So please don't submit a plant unless you're certain it will be available.

Although it's still early in the year, we'd like you to think about submitting an entry next winter if you feel your plant qualifies for recognition. Simply contact me, and I'll make sure that you are mailed an entry. Who knows? The plant featured on next June's cover may be yours.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Food Engineering Magazine.

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

Fabulous Food Plant: Paramount Citrus

Learn more about this fabulous food plant in Food Engineering's article, found here.

Podcasts

Burns & McDonnell project manager RJ Hope and senior project engineer Justin Hamilton discuss the distinctions between Food Safety and Food Defense as well as the implications for food manufacturers of the Food Safety Modernization Act.
More Podcasts

What was your favorite part of FA&M 2014?

View Results Poll Archive

THE MAGAZINE

Food Engineering Magazine

Food engineering magazine 2014 april cover

2014 April

Catch a preview of the Powder and Bulk Show in this April 2014 edition of Food Engineering. Also, be sure to check out a coffee stick making a real stir and a major advancement in the the pet food industry.
Table Of Contents Subscribe

THE FOOD ENGINEERING STORE

Food-Authentication-Flyer-(.gif
Food Authentication Using Bioorganic Molecules

This text provides critical tools and data needed to augment routine food analysis and enhance food safety by aiding in the detection of counterfeit, and potentially deleterious, foods.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

Food Master

Food Master Cover 2014Food Master 2014 is now available!

 

Where the buying process begins in the food and beverage manufacturing market. 

Visit www.foodmaster.com to learn more.

STAY CONNECTED

FE recent tweets

facebook_40.pngtwitter_40px.pngyoutube_40px.pnglinkedin_40px.png