Advertisement:
  LoginNew User? 
Forgot Password 
  Home
  Subscribe
  In this Issue
  Calendar of Events
  Departments & Columns
  Features
  Industry News
  Technology Sourcebook
  Resources
  Digital Issue Archive
  Archives
  Classified Ads
  Food Master
  Industry Links
  E-Newsletter
  List Rental
  Replacement Parts Directory
  Contract Manufacturing Resource Guide
  Special Reports
  Webinars
  Industry White Papers
  Market Research
  E-Learning
  FE Info
  About Us
  Contact Us
  Plant of the Year Entry Form
  2008 Media Kit
  2007 Food Master Media Kit
  2008 Rates and Editorial Calendar
  December 2007 BPA Statement
  Reprints
  Plant Construction Survey Form
  Conferences & Events
  Food Automation & Manufacturing Conference
  PlantTech Seminar
  ProcessTechnologyXchange
  Food Safety & Security Summit
  Related Publications
  Industria Alimenticia
  Dairy Foods
  Prepared Foods
  Packaging Strategies
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
New regs on tap for combustible dust explosions

June 1, 2008

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare

fex0608news1.jpg


Thirteen workers were killed and more than 60 seriously injured in a catastrophic dust explosion at Imperial Sugar in Port Wentworth, GA on February 7, 2008. While the dangers of combustible dust explosions have been known for many years, the only applicable OSHA legislation is geared toward grain dust and dates back to 1987. Thus, the Chemical Safety Board (CSB) criticized OSHA for not having the tools to conduct ongoing inspections for potential dust explosions in any environment other than grain.

Recently passed House Bill H.R. 5522, Worker Protection Against Combustible Dust Explosions and Fires Act of 2008, seeks to expand coverage beyond grain dust to all combustible dusts. The bill states that 25% of all combustible dust explosions have occurred at food industry facilities.

The bill points out that OSHA has not initiated rulemaking in response to CSB’s recommendations, and there is no OSHA standard that “comprehensively addresses combustible dust explosion hazards in general industry.” While this bill still has to pass Senate scrutiny and obtain the President’s approval, it would require hazard assessments, written programs to define methods for inspecting and controlling dust, engineering controls, housekeeping, employee participation and written safety and health information plus adequate training to minimize the potential for dust explosions across all applicable industries.

According Gary Q. Johnson, Workplace Exposure Solutions principal consultant and expert in ventilation and dust explosions, OSHA, in response to CSB, has released its “Combustible Dust National Emphasis Program.” OSHA has also begun several audits of plants to check for proper safety procedures to mitigate potential dust explosions. As a result, OSHA has issued more than 200 citations for non-compliance. In addition, 22 states including Georgia now have their own jurisdiction and track manufacturers where hazardous dust is involved.

Not every powder has the same explosive power, says Johnson. For example, cornstarch has a Kst (bar-m/sec) value of 202, whereas sugar has a Kst of 138, meaning cornstarch provides more explosive force than sugar. Kst defines the value of a pressure wave from a resulting explosion. As most likely happened at the sugar plant, secondary explosions caused by poor housekeeping often do more damage than the primary explosion.



Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.

Click the button below to sign up for the Food Engineering eNews.

Subscribe Now!Subscribe to Food Engineering
Subscribe to the
food & beverage industry's leading manufacturing publication. Food Engineering covers various articles including but not limited to products, processing technology, packaging, plant operations and food safety issues.
Subscribe

Advertisement:
© 2008 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy