This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Food Engineering logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Engineering logo
  • Home
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Digital Edition
    • Archives
  • Exclusives
    • Fabulous Food Plants
    • Plant Construction Survey
    • Plant of the Year
    • Sustainable Plant of the Year
    • State of Food Manufacturing
    • Top 100 Food & Beverage Companies
    • Web Exclusives
  • Topics
    • Latest Headlines
    • Automation
    • Cannabis
    • Case Studies/Field Reports
    • Columns
    • Dry Processing
    • Food Safety
    • Innovation
    • Packaging
    • Processing
    • Sustainability
    • Tech Update
  • News
    • Manufacturing News
    • New Products
    • People & Industry News
    • Plant Openings
    • Recalls
    • Regulatory Watch
  • Food Master
  • Resources
    • Classified Ads
    • Custom Content & Marketing Services
    • FE Store
    • Government Links
    • Industry Associations
    • Market Research
    • White Papers
    • Tech Flash E-newsletter
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Food Automation & Manufacturing Conference & Expo
  • Multimedia
    • Interactive Spotlights
    • Videos
    • Photo Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • eBooks
    • Food Plant of the Future
    • Webinars
    • Food Engineering's Youtube
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
  • Subscribe
Home » FDA vs. USDA: Who regulates what?
Food SafetyColumns

FDA vs. USDA: Who regulates what?

richard stiers
January 10, 2012
Richard F. Stier
KEYWORDS FSMA / recalls / USDA
Reprints
No Comments

Recall announcements issued by USDA for meat and poultry products and FDA for other foods keep processors current, help them better understand major issues and serve as excellent teaching tools.column

A significant percentage of recalls are now attributed to food allergens. They range from the accidental, where there is inadvertent cross-contact between products, to ones that are downright silly, such as when a product is packaged in the wrong container or a package is not properly checked before use.

One recent incident caught my attention. A produce company issued a recall because cut greens were found to be contaminated with Salmonella. The pathogen was detected as a result of USDA’s Microbiological Data Program (MDP), managed by USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS).

My first thought was why is USDA sampling produce? So, I looked into it. USDA has been sampling produce for years through MDP, which was launched in 2000 as an extension of the Pesticide Data Program, which collects and tests blind samples of fresh produce for pesticide residues. The industry has used results from this program to demonstrate that fresh fruits and vegetables grown in the US are reasonably unlikely to contain pesticide residues at health-risk levels and, in fact, have very low levels. 

For years, MDP took blind samples of fresh and bagged produce collected at distribution centers and tested for Salmonella, E. coli O157:H7 and Shigella. Published results over the years indicate an extremely low frequency of detectable pathogens on fresh produce in commerce. 
The program changed in 2008 when the agency not only collected samples but also began taking label and lot information. So, whenever a pathogen is detected on a sample, MDP informs FDA, which is obligated to ask the brand owner to perform a recall.

Obviously, if a ready-to-eat product such as produce contains a pathogen, it must be recalled. However, fresh produce generally has a shelf life ranging from 10-18 days. In the few instances where a positive for the target pathogens was isolated, I wonder how much was recovered. In this case, three days still remained on the product’s declared shelf life when the recall was announced, and very little product was probably still on store shelves. Nonetheless, the recall was initiated, and the result was most likely frightened consumers worried about what they had eaten in the past two weeks. 

Is this a good use of governmental resources? Does this program help ensure produce safety? Does it provide value to the industry and consumers?

USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service has publicly stated that MDP has prevented outbreaks of food-borne illness. Yet, in the 11 years since the program started, no AMS sampling has detected an outbreak, nor has it helped identify the source of a known outbreak. 

In addition, the individuals doing the sampling only collect samples. The program has no provisions for follow-up, observing or researching practices that may have contributed to the contamination. Finally, since the program was conceived, none of the detected microorganisms of public significance have shown up in the PulseNet database. This means none of these positives have been associated with a documented food-borne illness or outbreak. 

It would seem that, given budget constraints and the fact FDA is currently working on regulations that will put teeth into the Food Safety Modernization Act, this program could be eliminated. The program’s goal seems to be nothing more than gathering data, data that has already shown pesticides are not a significant issue in produce and the incidence of food-borne pathogens in these products is extremely low. Generating data that can’t be used for improvements is useless. 


Maybe USDA should refocus its efforts and resources on its original charge—meat and poultry. Even with continuous inspection in these industries, there are still a significant number of recalls.
 

subscribe to Food Engineering

Recent Articles by Richard Stier

Assessing risk in your operation’s food safety plan

Food defense has become a critical aspect of food safety audits

Cleaning, sanitizing programs are part of the food safety equation

Processors must ensure their PCQIs are qualified, trained and experienced

How Food Processors Can Create a Plan for Traceability and Recalls

Richard-stier-200px
Richard Stier is a consulting food scientist who has helped food processors develop safety, quality and sanitation programs. He believes in emphasizing the importance of how these programs can help companies increase profits. Stier holds degrees in food science from Rutgers University and the University of California at Davis. He is a Contributing Editor for Food Engineering. Email: rickstier4@aol.com

Related Articles

What you need to know before an FDA visit

Food Safety: The boy who cried wolf

Are regulators endangering our food supply?

Food Safety: What did you learn this summer?

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Subscribe For Free!
  • Print & Digital Edition Subscriptions
  • eNewsletter
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Popular Stories

Prestage Farms pork processing facility

How Prestage Foods of Iowa built a state-of-the-art pork processing plant

BKON's RAIN technology

RAIN uses vacuum cycles for extraction to occur at the deepest layers of coffee

water sustainability

Reduce, reuse, recycle can help processors meet water usage goals

date labels

Much food waste comes from misinterpretation on product date labels

Wonderful Pistachios' new automated production facility

Wonderful Pistachios meets global demand with new automated production facility

Food Master 2020

Events

April 26, 2020

Food Automation & Manufacturing Conference and Expo

FA&M logoFood Engineering's Food Automation & Manufacturing Conference and Expo (FA&M) is a 2 ½ day event that brings food and beverage processors and suppliers together to gain valuable information on the latest trends and technologies in manufacturing, automation, sustainability and food safety.

January 1, 2030

Webinar Sponsorship Information

For webinar sponsorship information, visit www.bnpevents.com/webinars or email webinars@bnpmedia.com.

View All Submit An Event

Poll

Severe Weather and the Supply Chain

How will this year’s severe spring weather affect your supply chain?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Packaging Research in Food Product Design and Development

Packaging Research in Food Product Design and Development

Packaging Research in Food Product Design and Development is the first book to comprehensively address the issues of graphics design and visual concepts, from a systematic, scientific viewpoint, yet with business applications in mind.

See More Products

2019 Top 100 Food & Beverage Companies

Food Engineering

FE December 2019 cover

2019 December

In the December 2019 issue of Food Engineering, we take a behind-the-scenes look at Prestage Farms' new pork processing plant in northwest Iowa.
View More Create Account
  • Resources
    • Food & Beverage Brands
    • List Rental
    • Survey And Sample
  • Want More
    • Connect
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing