This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Food Engineering logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Engineering logo
  • Home
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Digital Edition
    • Archives
  • Exclusives
    • Fabulous Food Plants
    • Plant Construction Survey
    • Plant of the Year
    • Sustainable Plant of the Year
    • State of Food Manufacturing
    • Top 100 Food & Beverage Companies
    • Web Exclusives
  • Topics
    • Latest Headlines
    • Automation
    • Cannabis
    • Case Studies/Field Reports
    • Columns
    • Dry Processing
    • Food Safety
    • Innovation
    • Packaging
    • Processing
    • Sustainability
    • Tech Update
  • News
    • Manufacturing News
    • New Products
    • People & Industry News
    • Plant Openings
    • Recalls
    • Regulatory Watch
  • Food Master
  • Resources
    • Classified Ads
    • Custom Content & Marketing Services
    • FE Store
    • Government Links
    • Industry Associations
    • Market Research
    • White Papers
    • Tech Flash E-newsletter
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Food Automation & Manufacturing Conference & Expo
  • Multimedia
    • Interactive Spotlights
    • Videos
    • Photo Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • eBooks
    • Food Plant of the Future
    • Webinars
    • Food Engineering's Youtube
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
  • Subscribe
Home » Food Safety:
Columns

Food Safety:

April 17, 2003
Reprints
No Comments
In industry self-monitoring programs, often partners are much more demanding of one another. Neither party wants to let the other down.

Rear Admiral Brenda Holman, FDA director for the Pacific region, was the featured speaker at a recent meeting of the Northern California section of the Institute of Food Technologists. Holman said that one of the ongoing goals of the agency is to respond to the Productivity Initiative enacted in 2001. This initiative calls for the FDA and other government agencies to do things more efficiently.

Holman’s comments reminded me of a great example of industry and government cooperation that has enhanced efficiencies and reduced costs for the government and has improved quality and safety in the dried fruit and nut industry in California. The program is the agreement or Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the FDA and DFA of California (Dried Fruit Association). (DFA has changed its name to the American Council for Food Safety and Quality, but many in the industry still refer to the organization as DFA.)

One program DFA has had in place for many years is quarterly surprise inspections of member plants to assure compliance with the current Good Manufacturing Practices found in 21 CFR Part 110. The association contracted with retired FDA investigators to assist in these audits. In the early 1990s, the association, under the leadership of Frank Mosebar, approached the FDA with a unique proposal. They felt that their audit program effectively assured that their member companies were in compliance with the GMPs and suggested that the DFA could relieve FDA of the burden of inspecting DFA member companies.

FDA leadership liked the concept, but could not simply adopt an industry self—monitoring program without verifying that the DFA programs were effective. Can you just hear the consumer groups howling in protest? “Industry self—inspection? That would be like letting the fox into the hen house.”

The agency looked at DFA member companies and compared them to non—member operations. After months of audits, the FDA acknowledged that DFA member companies had better sanitation standards than the non—members. In June 1994, the DFA of California and the FDA signed an MOU that “recognized that the DFA Laboratory and their sanitation standards met federal standards of consumer protection.” The MOU also entrusted the DFA with assuring member compliance with federal regulations, including immediate correction of any potential regulatory violations. If companies fail to take the necessary corrective actions, the DFA is obligated to notify FDA. According to Mike Hurley, DFA secretary and laboratory director, “The MOU has now changed into a full partnership agreement. Additionally, the Department of Health Services for the state of California has initiated a similar agreement with DFA.”

According to Holman, the program is the best example FDA has of industry and government cooperation. FDA is proud of this program’s success and is looking to develop similar arrangements in the future.

As an industry, we should be taking a closer look at what the DFA and FDA have created in California. The DFA and its members are serious about assuring they both protect consumers and maintain the trust of the FDA, but isn’t this what a quality food processor should be doing anyway?

Similar programs across the country, and between nations, should be developed. The FDA would then be able to devote their limited manpower and financial resources to areas that need attention. Often in self-monitoring programs, partners are more demanding of one another. It might even be compared to soldiers in the trenches—small groups of people forming a bond through living, working and bleeding together. I suspect that this is one of the driving forces behind the DFA program—neither party wants to let the other down.

subscribe to Food Engineering

Related Articles

Food Safety: Validating safety in your plant

Food Safety: Will ‘Reportable Food Registry' law make food safer?

Food Safety: The food security challenge to plant systems

Food Safety: Listeria and RTE foods, A step in the right direction?

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Subscribe For Free!
  • Print & Digital Edition Subscriptions
  • eNewsletter
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Popular Stories

North Carolina Food Innovation Lab

North Carolina Food Innovation Lab takes aim at food production of the future

sustainable packaging

Packaging industry pumps up R&D to keep pace with green goals

BKON's RAIN technology

RAIN uses vacuum cycles for extraction to occur at the deepest layers of coffee

Plant Opening

Plant Openings & Expansions: November 2019

date labels

Much food waste comes from misinterpretation on product date labels

Food Master 2020

Events

December 11, 2019

7 Things You’re Likely Missing to Win with Water Tracking

Water is one of the most critical resources in your manufacturing process—as an ingredient, for cleaning and as waste. Did you know you may be missing areas to monitor that could help your bottom line? Find out how some simple additions to what you’re monitoring can cut downtime, boost efficiency and reduce waste. Some extra analysis makes a huge difference in your water savings!
April 26, 2020

Food Automation & Manufacturing Conference and Expo

FA&M logoFood Engineering's Food Automation & Manufacturing Conference and Expo (FA&M) is a 2 ½ day event that brings food and beverage processors and suppliers together to gain valuable information on the latest trends and technologies in manufacturing, automation, sustainability and food safety.

View All Submit An Event

Poll

Severe Weather and the Supply Chain

How will this year’s severe spring weather affect your supply chain?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Packaging Research in Food Product Design and Development

Packaging Research in Food Product Design and Development

Packaging Research in Food Product Design and Development is the first book to comprehensively address the issues of graphics design and visual concepts, from a systematic, scientific viewpoint, yet with business applications in mind.

See More Products

2019 Top 100 Food & Beverage Companies

Food Engineering

FE November 2019 cover

2019 November

In the November 2019 issue of Food Engineering, learn about the new ways food and beverage processors are reducing their energy footprints.
View More Create Account
  • Resources
    • Food & Beverage Brands
    • List Rental
    • Survey And Sample
  • Want More
    • Connect
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing