Food Engineering logo
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
  • NEWS
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
  • EXCLUSIVES
  • MEDIA
  • FOOD MASTER
  • EVENTS
  • RESOURCES
  • EMAGAZINE
  • SIGN UP!
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • NEWS
  • Latest Headlines
  • Manufacturing News
  • People & Industry News
  • Plant Openings
  • Recalls
  • Regulatory Watch
  • Supplier News
  • PRODUCTS
  • New Plant Products
  • New Retail Products
  • TOPICS
  • Alternative Protein
  • Automation
  • Cannabis
  • Cleaning | Sanitation
  • Fabulous Food Plants
  • Food Safety
  • Maintenance Strategies
  • OEE
  • Packaging
  • Sustainability
  • More
  • EXCLUSIVES
  • Plant Construction Survey
  • Plant of the Year
  • Sustainable Plant of the Year
  • State of Food Manufacturing
  • Top 100 Food & Beverage Companies
  • MEDIA
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • White Papers
  • EVENTS
  • Food Automation & Manufacturing Symposium and Expo
  • Industry Events
  • RESOURCES
  • eNewsletter
  • Custom Content & Marketing Services
  • FE Store
  • Government Links
  • Industry Associations
  • Market Research
  • Classified Ads
  • EMAGAZINE
  • eMagazine
  • Archive Issue
  • Advertise
Food Engineering logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Engineering logo
  • NEWS
    • Latest Headlines
    • Manufacturing News
    • People & Industry News
    • Plant Openings
    • Recalls
    • Regulatory Watch
    • Supplier News
  • PRODUCTS
    • New Plant Products
    • New Retail Products
  • TOPICS
    • Alternative Protein
    • Automation
    • Cannabis
    • Cleaning | Sanitation
    • Fabulous Food Plants
    • Food Safety
    • Maintenance Strategies
    • OEE
    • Packaging
    • Sustainability
    • More
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Plant Construction Survey
    • Plant of the Year
    • Sustainable Plant of the Year
    • State of Food Manufacturing
    • Top 100 Food & Beverage Companies
  • MEDIA
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • FOOD MASTER
  • EVENTS
    • Food Automation & Manufacturing Symposium and Expo
    • Industry Events
  • RESOURCES
    • eNewsletter
    • Custom Content & Marketing Services
    • FE Store
    • Government Links
    • Industry Associations
    • Market Research
    • Classified Ads
  • EMAGAZINE
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issue
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
Food Safety

TECH FLASH

Quantitative framework would improve food safety

A recent technical paper grades food safety performance from A to F.

By Shane O'Halloran
Quantitative framework would improve food safety
April 8, 2013

Quantitative framework would improve food safety

The importance of effective food safety systems cannot be understated, yet no framework exists for analyzing quantitative data to assess US government and industry effectiveness. In the absence of such data, a recent Food Defense TQ technical paper from FoodQuestTQ seeks to use anecdotal evidence to establish and grade performance on seven benchmarks for creating a safer food supply.

The benchmarks include: 1) deterring the incidence of foodborne poisoning; 2) detecting contaminated foods; 3) communicating possible threats of contaminated food; 4) delaying the potential for the ingestion of contaminated foods until an effective response is mustered; 5) the timeliness of responses to potential food poisonings; 6) the quality of those responses; and 7) mitigating actions taken by industry and the government to ameliorate the future incidence of food poisoning.

The report grades 2012 levels of industry and government performance from A to F and makes several recommendations for improvement. The lack of current reporting requirements for defined performance benchmarks, Food Defense TQ says, makes quantitatively assessing performance in creating a safer food supply extremely difficult. The underlying purpose of the report is to encourage a framework which will result in standardized reporting requirements, making food safety a science-based endeavor as required by FSMA rather than a subjective art.

Food Defense TQ’s Complexity Systems Management (CSM) Method examines both the food safety and food defense risk countermeasures that comprise the entirety of the food protection system. The CSM Method is made up of seven steps on a food threat and risk continuum: deterrence, detection, communication, delay, response time, response quality and mitigation. Performance along this continuum dictates grades given for the seven benchmarks discussed above, as well as successful performance results in prevention.

In the first benchmark, deterring the contamination of food, Food Defense TQ assigned a C- for the use of science- and risk-based methods; a D for the timeliness and quality of government inspection; and a B+ on efforts to educate consumers. Instead of shifting to a science-based method, the report says government has pursued a one-size-fits-all policy for small, medium and large operations. The result is that some companies defer to the government’s lower regulatory compliance standards in an attempt to save money, not realizing a science-based method would result in greater cost efficiency than the current approach.

In the detection category, government and industry received a C- in identifying contaminated food products; a C+ in reducing the risk associated with their consumption; and a C- on interdicting the consumption of contaminated products. Food Defense TQ says although government and industry have the scientific and technical means to identify contaminated food products, they often do not use them. Large bulk testing often occurs at the beginning of the food manufacturing process with almost no testing at the end of the stream.

Food Defense TQ gave government and industry a D for timely notification of consumers; a C for timely notification downstream; a C for timely notification upstream; and a B for timely notification of government. Researchers found interdiction of consumption typically does not begin before the first reported illness or death, and current efforts focus more on containment than prevention.

Delays in reporting a potential recall while awaiting a full-scale response were also widespread. The report issued C grades for both timeliness of informing consumers about a possible recall as well as making a “recall or no recall” decision. Government and industry received a C- for determining the scope of a recall. Because consumers are not informed about the decision to recall a product until it has been made, the threat of consumption remains extremely high. Likewise, larger distribution scales make consumption more likely. The report found the decision to initiate a recall was influenced by multiple, often conflicting, risk factors including the cost of the recall, the likelihood of deaths or severe illness and the cost-benefit analysis of litigation versus recall.

Availability of traceability records received a C-, while recall management actions and logistical support each received C grades. Food Defense TQ says the timeliness of responses is complicated by the complexity of interrelated supply chains, resulting in broader recalls involving multiple companies and their suppliers. 

Quality of response involves the evaluation of a number of steps. Food Defense TQ assigned a C- for identifying the product; a C for informing consumers of danger; a B- for having comprehensive traceability records; and a C for recall training and testing. The report found that while industry may notify the government promptly of any food contamination resulting in illness or death, notifications are typically made after the fact. The passage of the Bioterrorism Act of 2002 compelled some industry progress in implementing a “one-up and one-back” traceability standard, but room for improvement remains.

The final benchmark for food safety performance is mitigation, or “the actions taken by government and industry to ameliorate the potential for future intentional and accidental poisonings.” The nature of government and industry science-based technology solutions received a D+, while tangible results of these investments in making the food supply safer and planning for future investments each received a D. The study found that because government and industry lack specific benchmarks for the food protection system, mitigation efforts lack focus. It also found a significant lag time between investments in food-related university research and the emergence of practical solutions for the food industry.

The report’s examination of food safety benchmarks led to four general observations. First, no set of common standards or criteria exists to guide protection of the food supply. Rather, varying schemes with different risk countermeasures have proliferated and are used across the world. Second, government and industry aren’t judging their food protection performance by scientifically derived measures, despite the availability of such methods. Third, stakeholders do not use a systems-based approach to gauging food safety performance. Finally, the type of information and data required to quantitatively evaluate the food industry is not being collected or utilized.

While many food defense protocols like HACCP and CARVER + Shock are in wide use, their effectiveness cannot be proven or disproven without a systems model or the collection of food protection performance data.

Finally, Food Defense TQ makes several recommendations. To ensure common food protection standards, the report recommends utilizing available technology and quantifying the value of food protection criteria to create a common set of effective standards.

To achieve scientifically derived, risk-based food protection measures, government and industry should better utilize the scientific method and use risk management methods in creating those standards. Researchers also recommended the adoption of a systems approach considering prevention and response across the food threat continuum. To facilitate the collection and analysis of data to quantitatively evaluate performance, industry and government must establish data keeping, collection and analysis requirements to gauge performance.

To read the full report from FoodQuest TQ, click here.                                 

KEYWORDS: food quality assurance food security FSMA

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • Global Organic Food & Beverage Market to Grow

    Global Organic Food & Beverage Market to Grow

    With a CAGR of 12.07%, Bonafide Research estimates this...
    Latest headlines
  • skilled MEP worker

    Predicting Food and Beverage Manufacturing Trends for 2024

    The two words that should be kept in mind are labor and...
    Automation
    By: Derrick Teal
  • cleaning and sanitation

    The basics of cleaning and sanitation in food plants

    Sanitation maintains or restores a state of cleanliness...
    Cleaning | Sanitation
    By: Richard F. Stier
Subscribe For Free!
  • eMagazine
  • eNewsletter
  • Online Registration
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Customer Service

OT Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities in Food Manufacturing Facilities

OT Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities in Food Manufacturing Facilities

Understanding Impacts of OT Cybersecurity Events in Food Manufacturing

Understanding Impacts of OT Cybersecurity Events in Food Manufacturing

Food Plant Openings and Expansions April 2025

Food Plant Openings and Expansions April 2025

FA&M 2025 in Rewind

FA&M 2025 in Rewind

More Videos

Popular Stories

Conagra Logo

Conagra Brands to Sell Chef Boyardee Brand to Hometown Food Company

Salt

FDA to Amend Standards of Identity to Include Salt Substitutes

Vilter IHP in plant

Industrial Heat Pumps: Sustainable Energy Solutions for Now and the Future

CHECK OUT OUR NEW ESSENTIAL TOPICS

Alternative ProteinAutomationCleaning/SanitationFabulous Food Plants

Food SafetyMaintenance StrategiesOEE

PackagingSustainability

Events

June 5, 2025

Mass Customization Driving Innovation in the Food and Beverage Industry

The food and beverage industry is at the nexus of transformative global manufacturing trends, driving a shift toward personalized, customer-centric solutions. 

June 5, 2025

How Cafe Spice Uses Automation to Propel Private Label

Learn about Cafe Spice’s new, state-of-the-art, highly automated manufacturing facility in Beacon, New York. 

View All Submit An Event

Products

Recent Advances in Ready-to-Eat Food Technology

Recent Advances in Ready-to-Eat Food Technology

See More Products

Plant of the Year

Related Articles

  • white house blue sky regulations

    Shift in poultry inspections will improve food safety

    See More
  • food safety and quality

    UMass team receives USDA grant to improve food safety

    See More
  • TraQtion

    Automating food safety management systems can save money, improve quality

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • small-occ.jpg

    Occupational Health and Safety in the Food and Beverage Industry

  • 9780367351052.jpg

    Food Process Engineering: Safety Assurance and Complements

  • food crime.jpg

    Food Crime: An Introduction to Deviance in the Food Industry

See More Products
×

Elevate your expertise in food engineering with unparalleled insights and connections.

Get the latest industry updates tailored your way.

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Food Master
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • eNewsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing

Food Engineering logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Engineering logo
  • NEWS
    • Latest Headlines
    • Manufacturing News
    • People & Industry News
    • Plant Openings
    • Recalls
    • Regulatory Watch
    • Supplier News
  • PRODUCTS
    • New Plant Products
    • New Retail Products
  • TOPICS
    • Alternative Protein
    • Automation
    • Cannabis
    • Cleaning | Sanitation
    • Fabulous Food Plants
    • Food Safety
    • Maintenance Strategies
    • OEE
    • Packaging
    • Sustainability
    • More
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Plant Construction Survey
    • Plant of the Year
    • Sustainable Plant of the Year
    • State of Food Manufacturing
    • Top 100 Food & Beverage Companies
  • MEDIA
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • FOOD MASTER
  • EVENTS
    • Food Automation & Manufacturing Symposium and Expo
    • Industry Events
  • RESOURCES
    • eNewsletter
    • Custom Content & Marketing Services
    • FE Store
    • Government Links
    • Industry Associations
    • Market Research
    • Classified Ads
  • EMAGAZINE
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issue
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!