Top

Do you know the cost of new equipment before you buy it?

Over its lifetime, the actual cost of food processing equipment can climb to as much as five times the purchase price. Industry estimates of acquisition cost, widely recognized to be a small fraction of total cost of ownership, are pegged at roughly 20% to 30% of an asset's total cost of ownership. Across a wider range of industries and equipment types, published studies put purchase price as low as 5% and as high as 50%.

The remaining costs hit your budget later: energy and water consumption, maintenance labor and parts, unplanned downtime, and regulatory compliance work. These costs can be tied directly to the manufacturer’s design decisions, made long before your purchase. Drainage slope, surface finish, material selection, and maintenance access determine how fast a wash cycle runs, how often a part fails, and how much documentation your team has to build from scratch. These are real costs.

Purchase price reflects none of that. Total cost of ownership reflects all of it.

Design Decisions Tied to Ownership Costs

Hygienic equipment design standards create a uniform framework for decisions that drive cost over the long haul. 3-A Sanitary Standards define the design criteria – drainage slope, surface finish, material specifications, cleanability and inspectability – that determine how equipment performs across every total cost of ownership category. Equipment that carries the 3-A Symbol has been designed and independently verified to conform to those criteria, not simply built to meet them on paper. That verification has direct implications for total cost of ownership.

“When a piece of equipment has that 3-A stamp, has that 3-A certification, it makes all of our jobs much easier,” says Jedd Taylor, Senior Principal Engineer, Leprino Foods. “If we're comparing something that doesn't have the 3-A certification and something that does, we're going to purchase [the 3-A equipment] even if there's a significant cost difference.

“The [equipment] that doesn't have that 3-A certification, that means I have to get in there and I have to evaluate it. I have to get into the design. I have to bring in other subject matter experts. It's a big resource drain on our company to do that,” says Taylor. “And it's more risk that we're taking upon ourselves.”

VIDEO | Jedd Taylor of Leprino Foods on the value of 3-A

6 Questions to Inform TCO Analysis

Most equipment vendors are good at answering the questions buyers typically ask: throughput, footprint, price, lead time. Those questions matter. But they can’t reveal the design choices that determine what you will actually pay to own the equipment over its expected life.

The six questions below fill that gap. The answers are necessary to perform a proper TCO analysis. A vendor selling equipment built to hold up in your operation will have specific answers. A vendor who hasn't thought about hygienic design at that level will stall, generalize, or promise to follow up. That response is data too.

The goal isn't to trip a vendor up or to be adversarial. It's due diligence, and it's the same due diligence a vendor confident in their equipment will expect and respect.

1. What is the validated CIP cycle time? And what water and chemical volumes are required with each cycle?

This question ties directly to your utility bill and your production schedule. A cycle that runs 20 minutes longer than it needs to run costs you water, chemicals, energy and line time, multiplied by every cycle you run, every week, for as long as you own the equipment.

Listen for: a specific number, tested under real conditions, not a range pulled from a spec sheet.

Watch for: "it depends on your setup" with nothing more behind it.

Small gaps here compound fast. Two machines that look identical on a spec sheet can carry wash cycles that differ by 20 minutes or more, and that difference adds up to real money and real line time before the first year is out. Ask for the number in writing, not verbally on the call, so you have something to hold the vendor to after the sale.

2. What is the recommended seal replacement interval? And are replacement parts, like seals, standard or proprietary?

Seals fail. The question is whether that failure is scheduled or a surprise, and whether the part that fixes it is sitting on a shelf or six weeks out from a single supplier.

Listen for: a defined interval in operating hours or months and confirmation that parts are available through more than one channel.

Watch for: proprietary parts with a single source and a long lead time. That's a cost you'll pay later, on their timeline.

A seal that fails mid-run rarely costs just the part. It costs the product in the line, the cleanup, and in some cases, a requalification of the run before product can ship again. A vendor who can name a specific replacement interval has clearly had this conversation before. One who can't is asking you to find out on your own.

3. What access does routine maintenance require?

A part can be well-designed and still get neglected if reaching it means a partial teardown. Ask what a technician actually has to do to inspect or service the component during a normal shift, not during a scheduled overhaul.

Listen for: tool-accessible design, minimal disassembly.

Watch for: an answer that only makes sense during a full shutdown. Maintenance that's hard to perform is maintenance that gets deferred, and deferred maintenance is how small problems become unplanned downtime.

This is something inspectors notice too. Equipment that's difficult to access for cleaning or service tends to show up as a recurring finding, not a one-time note, because the access problem never actually gets fixed. If you can, ask to see the access point on a similar unit before you sign, rather than relying on a drawing.

4. What's the mean time between failures for this equipment in my application?

Generic reliability numbers are easy to produce. Numbers that are relevant to your application may be harder. For example, dairy processing puts equipment through repeated thermal cycling and aggressive cleaning chemistry that other industries don't use. A vendor who has real data from an installation like yours will share it. A vendor who doesn't have that data will talk around it.

Listen for: figures tied to your application specifically.

Watch for: numbers borrowed from a different industry, presented as if they transfer directly. (They may not.)

If a vendor can't point to reliability figures for a comparable installation, ask which industry the number actually comes from. The answer tells you how much weight that number deserves. A number from a general industrial application is not the same claim as a number from a plant running your cleaning chemistry and thermal cycles.

5. Does this equipment carry a current 3-A Symbol authorization?

This is the fastest way to separate a marketing claim from a verified feature. The 3-A Symbol means an independent third party, not the manufacturer, has confirmed the equipment meets established hygienic design criteria: drainage, surface finish, material selection, cleanability and inspectability.

Listen for: a yes, with the authorization easy to produce or look up.

Watch for: "it's built to 3-A standards" without a symbol to back it up. "Built to" and "certified to" are not the same claim, and only one of them has been checked by anyone besides the seller.

Pro Tip: You can verify any 3-A Symbol authorization yourself in about a minute with the free 3-A SSI Certificate Directory.

This question tends to be the fastest one to ask and the most revealing. A vendor who has the authorization will usually offer it before you finish asking. A vendor who doesn't will change the subject to something else the equipment does well. That redirect is itself an answer, even when no one says so directly.

It's also the answer most directly tied to what the equipment costs you over the life you own it. 3-A certified equipment wins the decade, not just the moment.

6. What cleaning validation documentation ships with the equipment?

Commissioning a line means proving it meets Pasteurized Milk Ordinance requirements, FSMA preventive controls and whatever your state inspector asks for. That proof takes engineering hours to build. Equipment that arrives with documentation already in place shortens that work. Equipment that doesn't come with that documentation means your team starts from a blank page.

Listen for: documentation included as a matter of course, not something they'll "put together."

Watch for: vague reassurance instead of a document you can actually hand to your QA team.

When this documentation doesn't ship with the equipment, it doesn't disappear. It becomes a task on your engineering team's list, on your timeline, usually discovered during commissioning when there's the least amount of slack to absorb it.

Ask to see a sample of the documentation package before you buy, not just a promise that one exists.

Put the Answers to Work

These questions predict what you'll actually spend over the 15 years you own the equipment, long after the purchase order is signed and the initial quote is forgotten.

Taken together, the answers to these six questions map to the cost categories that make up a proper Total Cost of Ownership analysis: cleaning and utility cost, maintenance and parts, downtime exposure, and compliance risk. Ask the questions early enough, and you're not just qualifying a vendor. You're building the inputs for an analysis that will reveal which bid is truly the better deal.

It's worth saying plainly: the lowest bid on the table can still be the wrong choice once these six questions are answered. A machine that costs less up front but stalls on question two, three or six is a machine that will cost you the difference back, usually within the first few years, and often sooner. The questions exist to help you discover true cost before the purchase order is signed, instead of after.

Non-certified equipment may win the moment with a lower purchase price, but 3-A certified equipment wins the decade with a lower Total Cost of Ownership.

Comparing two bids? Use this free Total Cost of Ownership calculator to see which one is really lower.

Learn More

See what the answers add up to in real dollars in our webinar, "Total Cost of Ownership: A Framework for Evaluating the True Cost of Processing Equipment."

We use the free 3-A SSI Total Cost of Ownership calculator to walk through the math these questions feed into.

You will learn how a Total Cost of Ownership analysis surfaces all equipment costs, including the ones no one budgeted for. You will learn why equipment built in conformance with industry standards performs better in a Total Cost of Ownership analysis, and leave with a framework for more informed procurement decisions going forward.

Sign up to get the webinar in your inbox.