Maintenance personnel still make the majority of the maintenance replacement decisions overall (45 percent), but they saw their role reduced significantly from the prior year (64 percent).

The average dollar volume spent on replacement parts and components totaled $1.24 million, down from $1.34 million reported in 2012.

Nearly two-thirds of survey participants spent up to $1 million on replacement parts and components. Nearly one-third of participants say their annual replacement parts purchases amounted to between $100,000 to $499,999, up from the prior year, when one-fourth spent this amount on replacement parts. One-quarter of respondents purchased between $1 million and $4 million in replacement parts and components, down from last year when one-third of companies made purchases at this level.

Inventory interests

More than 40 percent of food and beverage companies have changed their inventory practices. Thirty percent of participants are reducing their replacement parts inventory and say cost is the main reason, followed by an effort to move to a just-in-time model or to dispose of obsolete parts.

Twelve percent of respondents are increasing their inventory of replacement parts and components, with new equipment needs emerging as the primary reason. New equipment also helps manufacturers eliminate or decrease downtime.

High-quality OEM replacement parts and components are selected 32 percent of the time when most parts are commodities with price as the determining factor when specifying requirements.

Nearly half of respondents say  they have quantified the maintenance cost of most machinery parts and are able to calculate ROI on higher-quality, expensive parts. One-third of those surveyed say they buy OEM when most parts are commodities and where price is the determining factor. Almost one in eight says manpower shortages force plants to specify the highest-quality available part as a way to prolong mean time to failure.

Problems from non-OEM parts vary from not working as well compared to an OEM part to concerns that received parts may be counterfeit. One-fifth of participants say they avoid potential work stoppages and downtime by using only OEM parts. Nearly 40 percent of respondents say less expensive non-OEM parts work just as well as their higher-priced counterparts.

An equal number (40 percent) says less expensive parts do not work as well as more expensive alternatives, and one-third report they have experienced premature machine failures with less expensive parts. “Careful evaluations are done before we use non-OEM parts,” says one reader.

Ninety percent of respondents consider the lifecycle cost of replacement parts as significant when making new equipment purchasing decisions. Three in 10 companies say they always consider lifecycle costs of the replacement part or component in their purchasing decision, while six in 10 say sometimes they consider it.

Replacement part ordering is automated in 75 percent of plants. Half of the companies report automating their ordering with system-generated purchase orders. Ten percent of respondents say they automate ordering with a direct link to a parts supplier or distributor, while another 11 percent rely on standardized hard copy purchase orders.

Regularly scheduled visual inspections are cited as the main maintenance replacement strategy implemented, selected more than half the time; the run-to-failure strategy is favored 20 percent of the time. Additional strategies include a time-based or volume-based parts replacement schedule, automated measuring of parts and components, and predictive tools such as vibration analysis, thermal imaging and energy use or heat measurement. 

A reader states one time-based approach could be “based off hour meters, stroke counters, etc. to track lifespan [of the component] and then schedule preventative change outs at 90-95 percent lifespan.” Another reader says he uses “more condition-monitoring equipment to time replacing parts on a time or volume basis.”

When asked what condition-monitoring tools  the maintenance program uses, thermal imaging and vibration analyzers emerge as the top two selections, with more than half of the maintenance programs using them.

Infrared sensors, oil analyzers and ultrasonic sensors are chosen by four out of 10 plants;  one out of 10 chooses stethoscopes as a condition-monitoring tool. Two of every 10 respondents indicate no condition monitoring is done at their company.

What’s your MRO?

Three maintenance repair operations (MRO) inventory practices are equally leveraged among companies this year: remanufacturing or re-engineering of parts onsite in a machine shop; vendor-managed inventory; and parts kits for routine maintenance. Central warehousing of common parts for use at multiple plant locations and consignment where the supplier owns the components are other, more common MRO practices.

A growing number of food and beverage facilities rely on less common types of MRO inventory practices (14 percent for 2013 as opposed to 4 percent reported a year ago). Survey contributors say other MRO cost-cutting strategies include “working with our suppliers and moving to a reliability-based maintenance system;” “review what parts are critical to maintain the operation of the equipment;” and “review which components have the longest lead time; if the replacement parts are high dollar items, they can be purchased in monthly increments instead of all at one time.” One firm says it created a new salaried position for parts maintenance and inventory control.

Less than half (43 percent) have implemented MRO cost-cutting strategies.  However, inventory reduction and vendor-managed inventories are mentioned frequently among food and beverage companies that have implemented a cost-cutting strategy. Reduction of obsolete parts is an additional strategy.