Jim Tonjes, former vice president of engineering for General Mills, recalls when he was asked to head the food safety program for that company just as FSMA was kicking into high gear.
“We had all the quality [assurance] people from the whole corporation in every single factory go through and come up with a list of what they thought could be a potential problem in their factory,” he recalled during a speech at Food Engineering’s 2017 Food Automation and Manufacturing Conference. “Well, that being said, it came back that the list was 10 miles long.”
Then, the CEO stepped in.
“[He] said to me, ‘I want you to take care of every single issue we’ve got in the whole corporation,’” Tonjes says.
So, over the course of the next two years, that’s exactly what he did. And during that time, he also decided to help other companies do the same and began giving educational speeches on the topic.
At one of those speeches, there was an audience member who served on the Obama council for food safety. After the presentation, the man raised his hand.
“He said, ‘I have to really compliment you and the company for what you’ve done to identify all these things,’” Tonjes says. “‘If you now so choose not to address any of those issues, we’ve got you.’”
The government representative went onto explain that the key to staying out of trouble is to address any potential food safety issue and keep a good paper trail showing every attempt was made to fix that issue. But if the decision was made not to spend money and something happens, that’s when the government will fine you. That comment has always stuck with Tonjes as conveying the importance of addressing sanitation issues.
The first thing a lot of companies have to consider when taking all this in is whether to build a new factory or fix an existing one.
“Along with the usual business case, such as ROIs and IRR thresholds, possibly the single biggest consideration that food processors need to factor into their new facility or upgrade plans is the limitations of their existing facilities,” says Tyler Cundiff, director of business development at Gray Construction, a design-build firm. “Fixing flaws in existing facilities will prove to be expensive and time consuming to correct while keeping the facility operational.”
Chris Jarc, vice president and project manager at Hixson Architecture & Engineering, says sanitary designs are possible in both new and renovated facilities, but existing facilities may contain food safety risks that are impractical or cost prohibitive to eliminate.
“It is easier to implement the most advanced sanitary design solutions in a new factory,” Jarc explains. “Yet, replacing an existing factory with a new one is an expensive proposition. Companies should assess the food safety risks in their existing facility and determine whether they can be cost-effectively mitigated. Each company’s capital expenditures and specific processing needs will drive how sanitary the facility can and should be.”
According to Tonjes, important for the sanitary design of plants, whether new or rehabilitated, is to “follow the water.” He explains that water will migrate wherever it can go down through the floor, including through the cracks. And he has even seen water migrate as much as four floors down.
“Water is your number one problem, no matter where you go. It’s process cleaning, roof leaks, wall moisture, floor cracks, floor tiles,” he says. “If you identify what your enemy is, then you [can] start to focus your building design around that.”
For example, while Tonjes was at General Mills, the company actually dissected pieces of equipment to find potential problems and found the water-tight seals on bearings weren’t effective.
“We actually cut bearings in two that had been on mixers for years, and they were so full of material, it was amazing … and it was a certified water-tight seal.”
Tonjes says he has also seen factories ignore things like roof leaks, which can lead to a lot of negative consequences, such as contamination issues.
Industrial enclosures, such as the ones made by Rittal, can help with water-related issues. They are designed to withstand the rigors of frequent washdowns, including those using high-pressure and high-temperature water, and aggressive cleaning agents.
For example, OSI Food Solutions Germany uses Rittal’s HD enclosures in a facility that produces 5.5 million hamburger patties a day. The blue silicone door seal allows its workers to spot dirty seals and replace them as needed.
OSI found that the enclosures worked so well—specifically their ability to be leak tight and resist cleaning chemicals of the HD line—that it now specifies the HD line as the standard for new machines and plants within their operations.
Another item that comes in constant contact with water and is important to sanitary plant design, but often gets overlooked, is drains.
Slot Drain manufactures a line of stainless steel trench drains for food and beverage manufacturers that routinely need to pass sanitation and safety audits. Unlike traditional grated drains, which attract and house bacteria, Slot Drain products are fabricated from hygienic stainless steel and have CIP capabilities and cleaning accessories, ensuring sanitation.
“The drain will fill itself, allowing for a sanitizer rinse to reach all parts of the drain body,” the company says. “Once the rinse is released, the brush and paddle sanitizing accessories are used to scrub the drains. When done effectively, it [the process] destroys bacteria, fruit flies and other microorganisms. The entire process takes a fraction of the time, effort and daily labor expense of grated trench drain systems.”
To help prevent outside pathogens from coming in, manufacturers must take a hard look at how ingredients and materials are entering their facilities.
“Ingredients play a huge factor in your food safety now,” Tonjes says.
If contaminated materials do enter the plant, they have the potential of contaminating the factory, so there must be a clear set of rules. In fact, many plants are disinfecting trucks as they enter their property to control the microbes that may or may not be on the trucks themselves. Tonjes knows of a water bottling factory that did this.
“They had 40 tankers per day coming into this facility, and they were basically going through a complete truck wash and sanitizing system before they were even allowed to enter the site,” he says.
There’s another outside source of contamination that is sometimes not considered—visitors. Tonjes says it is important for all people who enter the plant floor to follow the sanitation rules, whether they are workers, visitors or executives from headquarters.
“I’ve seen that, where they say, ‘Oh, don’t worry about it. You’re fine. Let’s go through.’ No, you have to really be stringent,” Tonjes says.
Once a company determines the factory’s problems, the next step is to prioritize the to-do list.
“You have to rate the potential issues, as far as food safety, allergens, explosive capabilities, that type of thing,” Tonjes says.
But addressing any sanitation issue requires one very important thing—management buy-in.
“If you don’t have management support directing people to take action against all these different items, basically it won’t happen,” Tonjes explains, “because people say, ‘OK, I don’t want to spend the money, [and] it’s not being pushed by management,’ and so basically, you lose a lot of that emphasis.”
He knows first-hand how beneficial taking action can be.
“When I was at General Mills … the CEO himself said to me, ‘Your job isn’t correcting all these food safety issues; your job is to help me sleep better at night,’” he recalls. “When we accomplished that whole task, he said, ‘Boy, I do sleep very well now.’”
For more information:
To watch all of Jim Tonjes’ speech at the Food Automation and Manufacturing conference, as well as many of the other speeches from the show, for free, visit http://www.foodautomationconference.com and click on the Broadcast Live banner.
Tyler Cundiff, Gray Construction,
Chris Jarc, Hixson Architecture & Engineering,
John Carnevale, Rittal,
Slot Drain, 855-497-7508,